1975-Man-As-A-Liar-University-of-Pittsburgh

Return to list of all Recordings See all Categories Spreadsheet: Recordings-Source-List

[[Category:]] [[Category:]]

Data Template

Title	1975-Man-As-A-Liar-University-of-Pittsburgh
Recorded date	(unknown0
Location	University of Pittsburgh
Number of tapes	1 x 60
Other recorders audible?
Alternate versions exist?
Source	SN - only copy
No. of MP3 files	2
Total time	45 minutes
Transcription status	notes only
Link to distribution copy	http://distribution.direct-mind.org/ (need password)
Link to PDF	http://distribution.direct-mind.org/ Or try http://selfdefinition.org/rose/
Published in what book?
Published on which website?
Remarks
Audio quality
Identifiable voices
URL at direct-mind.org	https://www.direct-mind.org/index.php/1975-Man-As-A-Liar-University-of-Pittsburgh
	For access to this wiki or the audio files please send an email to: editors@direct-mind.org
Revision timestamp	20150112141350

This is great stuff.

SN collection

File 1 = 31 minutes.

My talk tonight has to do with the reasons for the spiritual search.

I’ve come to the conclusion that man is a race of liars.

A race of liars are unable to tell the truth, and the majority of these people will never find the truth.

Playing the game. Tremendous mutual back-scratching, you tell your lie and I’ll tell my lie. Judges, doctors, pharmacists.

Lying inspectors, agents, governments go along with it. Newspapers lie.

Our children see it.

If you want to survive you have to be a liar.

Learn to lie adroitly.

No advantage in our society for telling the truth.

Everyone wants to be protected by some guild.

Education is a lie, tremendous load of garbage classes.

By the time you absorb the education you’re not fit to teach anybody.

All to fatten up the system.

The entity (organization) has to feed itself.

The people who are supposed to protect us are the biggest liars.

Lawyer has a license to lie. He is protected by his license.

File 2 = 14 minutes.

No, I’m the observer of the senses.

We can observe our bodies, senses, and we can observe the process.

As observer, have to admit some sort of duality.

So who is the fellow who acts, who decides?

Many are automatic?

Who is it that reacts?

The answer has to be that I don’t know.

There’s an observer observing himself, or there’s an observer and an actor.

Desire or fear.

Being able to desire is being able to act.

A compulsion?

Does not the witnessing of this compulsion open the door for influencing the compulsion.

And if we influence the compulsion we are an actor.