View source for 1989-0212-Zen-Is-Action-Columbus

{{Page header}}
[[Category:1980s]]
[[Category:Lectures]]
[[Category:Lecture of Questions]]
[[Category:Zen]]
[[Category:Has Talk Page]]
[[Category:Columbus]]
<div id="widthlimiter"> 
== Data Template ==
 
<!-- note, the page title is drawn in automatically via the template -->

{{Recording Data
|record-date          = February 12, 1989
|location             = Columbus
|number-tapes         = Two 90 minute cassettes
|source               = SN
|other-recorders      = No
|other-versions       = 
|dvd-number           = 
|number-mp3s          = Four files:  42 min; 42 min; 46 min; 29 min
|total-time           = 
|transcription-status = Draft process. Now at part 4 for Forum 
|distribution-link    =  
|distribution-pdf     = 
|published-book       = 
|published-website    = 
|remarks              = 
|audio-quality        = See notes on versions

Side one is very loud and overmodulated, while side 2 has low audio volume. Side 3 & 4 are normal.
|who-is-present       = 
|url-direct-mind      = 
|}}



== Notes ==
PS version 4 mp3 files: 42 min, 42 min, 46 min, 29 min.
This particular copy may have come from different sources. Side one is very loud and overmodulated, while side 2 has low audio volume. Side 3 & 4 are normal.

SN version way loud and overmodulated – done by SH

to resolve TW says his files are copies of MJ’s but MJ does not have this (TW does).

Where is venue? OSU, Wesleyan Center, elsewhere

=== Art’s Section Breaks ===
These are the last sentences of sections 2 through 5
Here's how I've got it separated out, Steve:

end part 2
41:03
That’s it. What are the five most important ones?

end part 3
So don’t be dismayed if you have some unhappy moments. The happy ones are as much of a mirage as the unhappy ones. Only the happy ones are more deadly – they’ll trap you. The unhappy ones only drive you away.
27:53

end part 4
21:49
Q. ??
R. You are getting it. This is as close as you may get. There ain’t too many of us around.

end part 5
01:14
But it seems like – we think that this is necessary – and people talk of discipline – what do you mean by that? There’s no greater discipline than a man who disciplines his own life. He’ll never be much harm to anybody else – because he won’t have reason to; he’s got values. But people who talk about discipline are generally talking about discipline from somebody else. We’re going to educate everybody; everybody’s going to be educated. Another hundred and fifty billion [dollars?] he says.
=== Topic: Intuition ===
Side 2 - Has story of Christian Scientist who used intuition re pump, atomic submarine.

Side 2 Says Bob Martin was source of Paul Wood's story about Gettysburg, etc. Story in Akron about onion, soup.

Article on savant idiots: http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/beautiful-minds/2014/02/25/where-do-savant-skills-come-from/
== File 1 ==
=== Forum Part 1 ===
File 1 – 42 minutes. 

00:00

Zen, basically, is finding answers, as all philosophical or religious or spiritual work is; finding the answer to self-definition: Who am I? Where am I going? Where did I come from? And people – blissfully or stupidly – lead their lives and never give it a thought, until they’re ready to die. And then they hurry up and pay their dues, thinking that will do it.

00:49

I’m not going to try to explain Zen to you, because Zen is action, not words. But I’m going to read something to you – I’m going to read some questions to you.  I’m going to ask you some questions. And I’d like for you to try to pick out five of them perhaps that you have an answer for, and we’ll get at them when I get through reading this.  

01:48

<blockquote>
What do you know for sure?
</blockquote>
Anybody ever ask you that?

<blockquote>
Does a man own a house, or does the house own him?

Does a man have power, or is he overpowered?

Is man a predator, or a victim?
</blockquote>
Behind some of these words is a whole philosophy, pro and con.
<blockquote>
Does a man enjoy, or is he consumed ? (by that which he thinks he enjoys)

Can a man learn that which he really wishes to, by himself alone?

Why build anthills before knowing what an ant is? (meaning of course houses)

Why do we build conceptual towers of Babel about human thinking before we know what thought is?

How can we dare to define thought before knowing the source and cause of all thought, or the essence of thought?

When we describe bouncing, do we describe the striking object or that which is struck?
</blockquote>
03:07

According to physics, the wall hits the ball as hard as the ball hits the wall
<blockquote>
Is thought the process of bouncing, or the object struck?
</blockquote>
Everything strikes back with an opposite reactive force.
<blockquote>
Can you start thinking?

Can you stop thinking?
</blockquote>
Try to stop thinking, first. Because you’re always thinking. Try to stop it. Then, make up your mind before you go to bed what you’re going to start thinking about when you wake up. See if it will work.
<blockquote>
Is thought a sort of somatic emanation?
</blockquote>
Behavioristic psychology says it’s just a little steam coming off of the body.
<blockquote>
Do we think, or are we caused to think?
</blockquote>
Meaning, can you stop thinking?
<blockquote>
Is negative thinking, as commonly discussed, negative to man, or negative to nature?
</blockquote>
In other words, you hear somebody saying a person’s got a negative attitude.  Sometimes the people who accuse him have a negative attitude.
<blockquote>
Does the brain generate thought like a radio generates a message coming from its speaker?

Is thought limited to the brain?

When a tree bends over, does it create wind by waving its branches?
</blockquote>
What are you doing for certain, versus what is done to you?

<blockquote>
What is telepathy?

Does thought travel beyond the head?

Does only the head think?

What is the vehicle for thought travel?
</blockquote>
04:51

What’s it riding on, out across the space, when you have a telepathic communication?

<blockquote>
Does the body manufacture thoughts, or does the body only serve as a conduit?

Where in the body are thoughts received during telepathy?

Where are they sent?
</blockquote>
05:11

We don’t seem to be interested. We carry out telepathic experiments but we never bother to go to the root.
<blockquote>
Do chemicals such as serotonin   and other neurotransmitters   create thought?

Or do they merely facilitate the penetration into our consciousness, of strictly sensory data?

Where will the answer to this question lead us? (multi-dimensional contacts)

How many full hours do we spend analyzing our thought processes? Or do we spend any?

Is it important to observe our reactions?

Are we only a body?
</blockquote>
05:52

This is the dictum of our present generation. It’s much easier to pretend to cure the body than to cure a mind. So the psychiatrists are strictly body-curers.
<blockquote>
In what part of that body is the seat of life?
</blockquote>
06:09

We can cut off an arm or leg, or cut out and replace lungs, heart, kidneys and still live. I think that some of the ancient nationalities believed that our soul is in the liver; so if they cut it out, there went his soul. We can have our nervous system severed at the neck, with paralysis except in the head, and still live and think. We can remain unconscious for years while the body continues to live, noting that a person who is brain-dead according to medical instruments can continue to live, breathe, and at times recover and function consciously. Where were they then, during the interim?
<blockquote>
Do we think, or imagine that we think?

Is our thinking automatic?

Do not our thoughts come before we have time to replace them?
</blockquote>
07:04

Try. Try to replace one.
<blockquote>
When we decide to search for the source of thought, why do we become mentally weary, or find our thoughts able to find objective or describable distractions – but unable to describe, name or systematize the progression, origins, or duration of thought processes?

07:29

Is man only a blob of protoplasm which is programmed to react according to a schedule, or is he a free agent? (conditioned reflexes, they say)

Are thoughts likewise only reflexes from programmed or calculated stimuli?

07:44
</blockquote>
07:47

I remember reading a snatch from an old Sufi book,  the guy had supposed to have written it a thousand years ago, and he said that the greatest enemy that a spiritual person has, or anybody has, is conditioning. And of course that’s the trend of our modern psychology.

<blockquote>
Who programmed? Who stimulated?

Can we observe our thoughts?

If we observe our thoughts, who is looking?
</blockquote>
That’s serious – when you see your own thoughts, who is looking?
<blockquote>
When we observe our thoughts, are we not thinking about thinking?

Is such a thinker someone who dreams of yesterday, thinking that he watches a dreamer?

Or is he a detached watcher of past and present thoughts, who is awake and aware of the mechanical man?

What are we, an animated body in a suppressed, stagnated soul?

Do we have a mind? Are we mind-stuff? Or are we a programmed body and mind?

Do we actually know that which we are doing? 

If so, why do we repeatedly regret things that we do?

Does the metazoan, insect, animal or man know why it reproduces?
</blockquote>
Everybody’s so noble, but they run right out and pop little ones, and go through the necessary machinery or role to do so.
<blockquote>
Do the trees create wind by waving their branches, or is it always moved by an external force?

Does a person seduce another, or are they both seduced?

What does man do besides fertilize?

Are you a hero or a victim?

Are you loved, or are you consumed?

Do you have possessions, or are you possessed by them?

Which is more evident and apparent to you: your divinity, or your animal appearance?

If we wish to plan our lives, do we not need to consider while planning that it may be all planned, and that we have no choice?

How do we plan around that possibility?

10:15

Must we not define our limitations?

When we define our limitations, do we automatically need to define ourself?

Do we discover more accurately the nature of our Self?
</blockquote>
By Self I mean with a capital “s”. When we talk about finding the Self or defining the Self, we’re talking about capital-“s” Self. For the small-“s” self, I agree with B.F. Skinner,  that that’s the animal self.
<blockquote>
How much of human action is fated, predestined?

Is the knowledge of factors of any value in the face of possible predestination?
</blockquote>
If we’re predestined, why act? Or why refuse to act?
<blockquote>
What do we know for sure? Do you believe more than you really know?

Is all our reality merely a collective belief? A paradigm?
</blockquote>
Of course, if you want a reference to that theme, it’s Joseph Chilton-Pearce. ,   Chilton-Pearce believed that we can create our own paradigm.  I think a lot of people are going about things that way. The big game in life today is to create by agreement, by whooping it up: “We’re going to create a perfect world.”

11:46
<blockquote>
Is science a mental feat created by mankind, or is it only a human discovery of a mental set?
</blockquote>
You’ve got a mathematical set, and we carry it on – we find out that we can build greater sets with the aid of the little sets, and the result is possibly a science. I’m just asking, “Is it?”
<blockquote>
Or is scientific reality only a progression of events, planned and expedited by a mentality of cosmic or spiritual proportions, which utilizes the mentality, egos and energy of humans?

What is life?

What is death?

Are these items ever properly defined except in terms of each other?
</blockquote>
Life is not death, death is not life, and we’re satisfied.
<blockquote>
Can theological facts be established by voting?

Is Mary the mother of God, or is humanity the mother of God? Or neither?

Is God determined by victorious armies?

Is virtue established by psychological edict? By ecclesiastical vote? Or by the requisites of our ultimate essence?

What is sin? An offense against yourself? An offense against your fellowman? An offense against God?

Is an offense against God recognized by divine outcry, earthquake or cosmic catastrophe?

Is it a sin to eat meat?

15:29

Are the animals our brothers? Are they possessed of intelligence and soul?

Do animals sin when they eat other animals?

Or are such sinning animals pardoned for keeping ecology in balance?
</blockquote>
That’s one of the great whoop-de-doos today, keeping ecology in balance. So we might absolve them from their sin.
<blockquote>
Is it wrong to kill except for food?

If so, why do we do wrong by not eating the people we kill?

14:01

Who is knowledgeable about good? (in the item of goodness)

Is good that which we desire, or that which is in itself good?

What is the condition of being “in-itself” good? (or in-itself whatever)

If a man drives a horse through a plate glass window, should the man be prosecuted or the horse?

If a man steals to feed his children, should we prosecute the man or that which drove him, the children?

If a man rapes a girl should we prosecute a) the man, b) the girl who tempted him, c) his ancestors for his genetic inheritance or glandular inclination, or d) the force that designed mankind?

What is equality?

Was Samson equal to Delilah?

Is a baby equal to a dying man?

Are you only half of a plan by virtue of not possessing both sexes?

Is peace of mind more important than global peace or herd-peace?

15:16

Who or what are you?

Are you only a body?

Are you rather a complex organism, a cell colony, a nature-oriented bundle of conditioned reflexes?

Is the brain a monitoring station, designed for the organism’s indefinite survival?

Or is our body programmed for death, following procreation, like the corn and the wheat?
</blockquote>
I’m speaking of the death gene now. In other words, once you reproduce, you’re no longer needed.

15:56
<blockquote>
Is all religion and philosophy merely rationalization, emanating from the computer, to answer constant cellular awareness of death?
</blockquote>
In other words, is religion an outgrowth of the fear of death?
<blockquote>
Or is the universal belief in life after death an intuitive reading from that computer? – a reading not completely translatable into computer symbols, which are limited.

Is there a soul? Did it exist before the body, or must it be developed, grown or evolved?
</blockquote>
Nobody seems to care.
<blockquote>
Prove the following: mind, other than somatic awareness; subconscious mind; ego, id, superego; chakra, kundalini; tisra-til;   astral, etheric, causal, desire bodies; aura, halo, ectoplasm;   spiritual ear (there has been a lot of money spent on that one), spiritual nectar; conscience.
</blockquote>
In other words, these things are being thrown about – that’s the reason I listed them – and we somehow manage to put a lot of importance on them.
<blockquote>
What is time?

Does time pass, or is only you who passes?

Is space-time a stable matrix, while we are only transient visitors?

17:38

How much of life is only a mirage? (some people when they’re dying might see it as that)

Do we see this world infallibly, or obliquely?

Are the senses fallible, or infallible?

Can you see, hear, feel, smell or taste time?

Is time only a relative conceptualization? What is the reality of time?

Does the ant or amoeba interpret duration the same as a man, or does its time pass more swiftly?
</blockquote>
18:19

In other words, does he lead a long life? – or does the fruit fly live only a few minutes of our time.  Maybe he lives a long life. [to him]
<blockquote>
What is duration? What does a lifetime feel like?
</blockquote>
When you get to be my age, you’ll know a little more each year how much it feels like.
<blockquote>
Does it feel different to a child than to an old person?

What is the relation of memory to time?

Do we remember a duration, or measure it, if we have no clock at hand?

Do we remember how long a pain lasted, when it occurred a year ago?

19:00

Would women become pregnant as often if they remembered the duration and intensity of the pain of childbirth?
</blockquote>
Did you ever talk to them about it? The ones I’ve talked to didn’t think much of it, after a few days had gone by, or maybe a few weeks.
<blockquote>
Do we have a real sense of time when we hear a clock ticking? Do we then know what a second is, or what stretch of consciousness exists for others in that second?

Do the wings of a hummingbird move rapidly or slowly, to the gauging of the hummingbird?

To the time sense of the fruit fly, is his life long or short?

Is the sense of duration, or passing time, proportional to the mass of the entity that experiences it?

Does time exist other than as a fascination which seems to be brief or longer of duration?

20:00

If the sun is our ultimate clock, of the earth’s rotation as a measurement, what is our measurement of time after the death of our senses?

Is time an illusion that prevents us from experiencing a Self that has no motion?

Have you ever heard a clock ticking in a delirium?

If the mind can be distorted in a delirium, or in an LSD trip, does the mind ever understand the true feeling of a second?

What is nostalgia? Is it the soul’s viewing of a previous feeling?

What is space? Is space interdependent with time? 

Are they not measured by each other?
</blockquote>
Such as with a light-year; time is determined by spatial phenomena, rotation. 
<blockquote>
Do space and time exist at all except in reference to us?

What is the understanding of insects, of the distance to the sun or moon?
</blockquote>
If they could look up and see that, what would their appraisal be as far as time is concerned? Because they have no clocks. 
[note: mixes time and distance]
[Forum part 1 ends]
=== Forum Part 2 ===
sn1-21:24 [goes to 41:19, the end of file 1]
<blockquote>
Do we have a true picture of nature?

When we appreciate nature as being beautiful, is such appreciation of life, or of death?

How much of what we consider beautiful is the ebbing and flowing of life?
</blockquote>
One time a fellow came to my house and it was springtime. The birds were chirping and the grass was beginning to grow, and everything looked promising and wonderful. I said, “Did it ever occur to you that they might be screaming? They’re eating each other out there while they’re doing that.” They don’t lose a meal, you know.
<blockquote>
Have you ever watched the war that goes on in a drop of water, or in a cancerous tissue?

22:11

How many protozoans are required to sustain the world’s metazoans? Can they be counted?

How many protozoans are eaten alive every second?

How many microscopic metazoans are eaten each second by larger metazoans?

Is death painless for these beings? Do they scream?

How many small metazoans are needed to feed one worm  or one insect for a day?

22:38

How many worms or insects die every minute to feed the birds?

How many worms or insects are needed to feed a pair of birds and their fledglings each day?

How many worms or insects are needed for one hen’s egg? 

</blockquote>
Boy, you’re getting a lot of life there.
<blockquote>
In the summer we hear the hum of many insects. Is the hum beautiful, orchestral, or a bedlam of screaming?

Are not trees more attractive in autumn, when dying?

Which is the true destiny of all beings: a growth into individual eminence, or a means of energy-food for higher beings? – meaning predators.

</blockquote>
sn1-23:26

[break in tape – something missing – check against other versions ]

[Maybe this is the WV Joke]

Was his last name God?

Now this is what I call a theological section:
<blockquote>
Should self-definition have priority over concerns for health?

Is the idea of personal immortality, before such an idea has been proven by experiencing immortality, any more than an egotistical idea?

What are the mechanics of divine healing?

Should the search for God have precedence over using an unidentified divinity as a healing utility?
</blockquote>
24:06

Some people are searching for God, but some people are just able to learn how to heal and they ascribe that to God. Or at least they think they’ve got a toe-hold on God because they healed somebody, and in healing them call it divine.

<blockquote>
Is God a gigantic gestalt?  

Why are we here?

Are we accidents of evolution, animals that accidentally evolved upon a planet that accidentally evolved?

The chances of accidental evolution seem unlikely in view of the complexities of protoplasm, such as the ability of the cell to produce milivoltage components and to possess memory. Can we say that all this came about by an immediate or instantaneous teleological prompting which had to take thousands of years to develop, after the million years needed to evolve less-specialized cells similar to plant cells?
</blockquote>
25:14

In other words, look at the time between these. If it’s a theory that we evolved from ketone enzymes, for instance, how many million years for that type of evolution? And then you look at a thing like synapses in the human brain and neurotransmitters, very delicate chemicals – how would these very delicate chemicals evolve?

25:44
Were we created by a skillful biochemist? If you look at a building or an airplane and you see the components of it, there had to be some skill there, rather than evolution. 
<blockquote>
What is the process that would result in the evolution of synaptic voltage? How would we bring it about if we tried to synthetically?

[Question missing, something like: “Is it possible that all life is a dream?” << this is confirmed here:  http://www.selfdiscoveryportal.com/arQuestionsLecture.htm ]

Is it possible that all life is a dream?

If so, is it not a very detailed and consistent dream, showing few variations, seeming to strictly adhere to a blueprint? 
</blockquote>
In other words, if it’s a dream or an illusion, it’s abiding by some sort of blueprint.
<blockquote>
Is man manufacturing this blueprint, by setting up a rough paradigm, and creating details such as brain chemistry as he goes along? 
</blockquote>
That’s what Chilton-Pearce thought, that we were doing it ourselves. A lot of people think that we’re making this a nicer world to live in, and all this kind of stuff. But can they? Is it possible?

26:47
<blockquote>
If so, has man lost control of his creation, if he cannot find an alternative for disease and death?
</blockquote>
When our lusts reach a certain peak, it seems as though new diseases come along to keep us busy
<blockquote>
What are the odds for an accidental synthesis of a ketone enzyme? (Just accidentally, in a little puddle of water.)

What is the significance of common denominators? Are they valid for evaluating religion and behavior?
</blockquote>
We use this thing of common denominators to evaluate a truth in mathematics. Can we do that by saying that just because they exist in great numbers, they must be important?
<blockquote>
Is there a body-manufactured force?
</blockquote>
This is another realm of research or thought – such as [anodile? anodyle?]  vril,  élan vital,  or quantum energy,  capable of tremendous magical power, transferrable and projectable.

27:53
<blockquote>
There are two windows, states of mind, which are not consistent with each other: they are the daytime view and the nighttime view. The latter, with its dreams and horizontal speculations, upon awakening forms a strange field of thought and threatens the convictions of daytime. How do we balance this force?

What bearing do these often morbid night states of mind have upon violent acts?

Is there any value in speculating on the genesis of biological or human life, weighing the value and importance of slow evolvement against the possible perfect instantaneous creation? And weighing the suffering and dying against perfect or unchanging immortality?
</blockquote>
“Don’t worry,” they say, “you’ll be born again.” So you suffer a little, pay your taxes.

<blockquote>
Are ecologists possibly trying to thwart the ordained directions of the engineer who designed the evolution of life?

29:02

Sanity and syphilis – are they both approved by democratic voting? 

If man did not cause himself, then that which caused him is invisible, meaning not apparent in this dimension. What reason would a superior engineer have for creating life as seen on earth, all flora and fauna?

29:32

How rational are some of the reasons given for the acceptance of the creator-concept, and a set of morals presumed to gain tolerance from that creator?

</blockquote>
(Not much more to go.)
<blockquote>
What is talk? Why is talk necessary?

What causes different perspectives?

What liabilities are incurred with unavoidable states of mind?

What is a state of mind? 
</blockquote>
I’m dead serious. I’d like for you to know. Because these are the things that move every human being: states of mind. They’re not in the psychological glossary.

30:19
<blockquote>
Are our perspectives rooted in valid bases and definitions, or in indefinable feelings? – which may be as valid or meaningful as definitions.

Does a given color cause the same reaction in all people?

Why do some perfumes enchant one person and cause nausea in another?

What is beauty?

How do perspectives which are influenced by feelings affect science?

Do they help of hinder?

Can a scientist totally rule out feelings of judgments?

Did the scientists of Columbus’ time feel that the earth was flat, or know that the earth was flat?

</blockquote>
How about some of them today, then?

31:06

<blockquote>
What is wisdom?

Is it foolishness or wasted effort, unless it is restricted to objective or materialistic values?

Is all wisdom unbiased?

Is a wise man just one who gets along with his fellowman? (We’d like to have that belief.)

Is wisdom just adaptation, symbiosis, or blending with others to a point of losing personal identity?

31:38

Is silence a trademark of wisdom – even if the silence is caused by cowardice?

Who or what is the authority in regard to human essence or nature?

Does a man love, or is he incapable of loving?

Does a man desire to be loved while pretending to love others?

Does a tick love the host, or the blood of the host?

Is love of every kind programmed and projected onto us?

Is there only one dimension?

Does not the possibility of multiple dimensions weaken our significance and our pretended potential for controlling the environment?

32:32

What is God?

What are his dimensions?

What is the soul?

Are these just aberrated ideas?

Why do people use words like God or soul without going to some effort to define them?

What is an idea?

Is there a thinking self, or only an awareness that witnesses reaction, and possibly witness a pseudo-ego or self?

Can a man have spiritual or essence clarity and be psychologically confused? 

[repeats this for emphasis]
</blockquote>
The savant idiots, the starets  of Russia – plain nuts, they say.
<blockquote>
Are we an individual, or a conglomerate of several selves?

If there is such a conglomerate, how is the real Self isolated? 

Have we just now isolated the real Self, by taking the position of an external questioner?

Is thought a possession or an obsession?

What is the relationship between thoughts and glands?

What is sanity or insanity?

34:09

Is sanity only somatic healthiness?

Are unpopular people insane? Or outside the normal curve?

Could sanity ever mean that state of mind with perfect understanding of all problems? A state of mind from which the altering lens of ego has been removed from mental vision or perception?
</blockquote>
34:37

<blockquote>
Would such a version of sanity imply the need of perfected logic, or perfected intuition?
</blockquote>
Intuition is another item that is not seen much in your psychological texts.
<blockquote>
What is intuition? How does one arrive at it?

Is thought a reaction to an electrical stimulus?
</blockquote>
Now this seems to be the biochemical idea of thought, that it’s an electrical stimulus caused by voltage, leaping across the synapse.
<blockquote>
If we cannot willfully think, do we ever make decisions?

Or is it possible that only the people who realize that they cannot enforce decisions, are the ones who eventually may find ways and means to make things happen?

If we think about thought, is thought then objective and separate from the thinking self?

Is thought an entity, or an emanation of sorts?

Can sanity be gauged by logic? (It should be.)

Is behavior considered normal by virtue of percentages of incidence? 

Is all such “normal” behavior always logically excusable?
</blockquote>
In other words, if fifty-one percent of the people in this country become murderers, it will be normal. Is that logical?
<blockquote>
Is sanity a way of measuring the skill of survival?

Or is sanity also involved in the skill of checking factors such as motivation, correct reasons for living, quality-control of morality, and the control or evaluation of environmental factors?

Would our behavior be the same if we discovered by logical or even common-sense means that our environment were greater or less than we previously believed it to be?
</blockquote>
36:52

In parenthesis I have “More mind dimension.” The sanest bird cannot outwit the rifle, much less the higher technology of poisoning. 

<blockquote>
Would we behave the same if we discovered beyond speculation that there was no life after death? 
</blockquote>
If we really got that proof someday – absolutely nothing but oblivion – how would that affect our behavior?

37:23
<blockquote>
Are we not caught somewhere between, and is not this materialism a bit of fence-riding, that says on one hand we can accept only that which we see, while refusing to look for or see new factors not immediately accessible to our senses? Or new truths which would give new definitions to life and new meaning to existence.

Psychiatry contains opinions rather than pure scientific findings. Has psychology become a cult?  

Does psychology or psychotherapy rule by edict rather than by reason?
</blockquote>
If the high priest says, “That’s it,” then that’s the law.
<blockquote>

Is there any science in the modus operandi of these current mental therapies?

38:16

Is it safe to allow psychologists to monitor our lives if they are only cognizant of body-survival and would program us only for that?

Are psychologists who work in advertising and promotion a boon to mankind, or are they the manipulators without proper respect for the victims of selfish or spurious interests?

Can the psychiatrist produce sanity in a person if he has not adequately defined sanity? 
</blockquote>
38:50

This is their stock in trade, those words. They have nothing but words for their stock in trade and they can’t define the words.
<blockquote>
If he defines sanity, should the psychiatrist not be required to bring sanity to every patient who is any degree insane?
</blockquote>
Now they admit they’re insane, because they’ve got to get their money. But lately there have been lawsuits when somebody runs amok after dealing with a psychiatrist, and I presume that that’s a proper thing. They should either be a good witch doctor or no witch doctor.
<blockquote>
What does behaviorism prove?

What do the tracks made by an animal prove? Do they tell you about the essence or purpose of that animal?

Does a normal curve define normality and morality?

39:50

Can we study the mind by ignoring brain chemistry and behavioristic testing? 
</blockquote>
I call that introspection, structure-less.
<blockquote>
Is it more important to know what a man is thinking or capable of doing, than it is to know who is thinking or doing, and what is thought?  

Are the conclusions reached by introspective thinking corroborated by sciences such as brain chemistry and the statistics of behaviorism?
</blockquote>
40:27

Now I’ve got a point here that I just realized the importance of lately; I throw this out with no indicated partisanship: 

<blockquote>
Is the photon an intelligent messenger of God?

Is the photon a distraction-being, that dazzles the human eye so that he cannot see the realities found in introspection?

Will you ever be free and at the same time be aware?
</blockquote>
41:03

That’s it. What are the five most important ones?
[Forum Part 2 ends]
[silence]
[tape ends at 41:58 << trimmed off dead space. Now ends at 41:19]
== File 2 ==
File sn2 – 42 minutes. First 4 ½ minutes of side 2 was blank (so deleted in mp3).

=== Forum Part 3 - Intuition ===
sn2-00:00

[gap in tape: sn, ps, bm, tw versions]
Q. [SH added question about intuition, which R appears to be responding to.]

Q. Could you say more about intuition?

R. Intuition is something that I don’t find in any books; I don’t find an analysis of it. Our thinking is limited to a set of symbols, composed of an alphabet when we speak of it. We examine things interminably, battling back and forth, making graphs and charts, thinking we’ll get some mathematical formula. 

But I maintain that the human mind has a factor which the whole psychological system has dodged; the practitioners have no knowledge of it, can’t use it. And that is, that intuition leads to direct-mind communication. Intuition doesn’t come from learning. It comes with the child. The little child has no language. I always said that children are born like gods, angels, and we seduce them with language in order to put them to work. Somebody said way back there, that little children would have access to the kingdom of heaven. He also said the kingdom of heaven is within you. It’s through this childish intuition that the road becomes wider. And there are ways and means of developing your intuition.

sn2-01:57

Q. Care to say what they are? 

R. I won’t tell you – because it’s different for different people. But to give you an example of where it applies, I used to work on the atomic submarine, up in Alliance, Ohio at a research place.  They were using atomic isotope power for intense heat. They had NaK, which is a compound of sodium and potassium, a liquid metal that looks like mercury. They were trying to get pipes that would carry that to a boiler, and it burned up everything they put it into. When they put it through copper tubes they immediately melted. So they devised a big pipe with a hole through it about the size of a pencil so it wouldn’t blow up, and they had to pump it. But they couldn’t escape getting into the impeller of the pump, and the impeller floats on bearings that are greased; as soon as NaK hits water or any water compound it blows up. So they were at a dead standstill on creating a pump.

sn2-03:54

So what happened, there was a man there, a Christian Scientist – I’m not touting Christian Science; in fact I used to needle him all the time because I thought he was leaning too much on belief.   But this man had no chemistry or physics. I had majored in physics myself so I knew a little bit about it, but I knew nothing of what was going on, and this man had no education in that field. But he said one day, “Why don’t you pass the NaK between the field and the central armature.”   And they said, “Oh, that will never work, because it’s a metal and it will probably wrap around and unite with the copper.” And he said, “Why not try it?” Of course it seemed like it was doomed to failure because of the heat element. But they did it. They tried it, and that’s the reason they’re pumping it today, because a man who wasn’t even a scientist had an intuition.  ,  ,  

sn2-05:02

Another thing is, you look at these savant-idiots as they call them.  You say to the guy, “What’s 350,000 times 242,999?” And he thinks awhile and tells you, and they check it out on the computer and he’s right. That’s intuition. That’s an instant knowledge of something that’s seemingly unknowable. But he’s got some key. All these other doors are shut off, so he can focus on intuition. Also, the animal has intuition: the animals know when to run when they’re attacked. But we are very complex beings, we have trained ourselves to be mechanical: “Don’t move until you’ve added up the column and subtracted it correctly, so we know exactly what’s going on and we can predict it next time.”

sn2-06:03

Intuition brings up a lot of things, very valuable, that can’t be duplicated – because the operator doesn’t even know why. When I was in the seminary I was just a kid; I went away when I was twelve years of age. I didn’t know anything about religion – except that I always thought God was in the altar. Also I thought the nuns and priests had no intestines, that they had no bowel movements or anything like that. I thought they all had to be saints. Of course I was disappointed in that, you might say; I found them human. But I just sensed that they weren’t sincere. And I got out. I left them, just because of that sense. If I hadn’t, I’d be a slave yet today. I’d be a slave to a dogma I couldn’t prove.

sn2-07:15

Now I can’t prove a lot of things that I know, but I can show them to you. We had a meeting, I think it was in this building, [which?]  and we  were doing experiments in hypnosis. The reason for this is to show that through hypnosis you can see the human mind very clearly.  After you get into harmony with your audience you can start to tell which ones are susceptible. There’s no reason; you can’t say it’s the blinking of an eye or what it is. But this intensifies. I used to walk through the audience and point at a person and say, “You have a headache, don’t you?” Now a lot of people might say that you’re suggesting it, because there’s a hypnotic background. But the hypnosis was to remove the headache. 

sn2-08:19

We had a Chautauqua up in Pittsburgh and two doctors were sitting there; one was a chiropractor from Cleveland, Leslie Hauserman,  and the other was an MD from Ravenna, Ohio, Fred Bissell.  And not only could I see the headache but I could put my finger on it. Then I would take the headache away; I pulled it out the top of their head. Hauserman said, “Something like that happened to me.” He said he had a little girl who came in with her mother, and the girl said to the doctor, “You have a sore shoulder.” He said, “How’d you know?” She said, “I know, I can see it.” And he said, “Can you point your finger where it hurts?” This was a twelve year old kid; she walked over and put her finger right on it.

sn2-09:43

This is intuition. You don’t have to believe this, but you’ll run across incidents in your lifetime and people will tell you these things. Now this is without the formula. But there is a formula, and you’ll understand it once you see enough of it. In the book The Direct Mind Experience there’s a chapter on betweenness,  that explains how it happens and the way you hold your head for it to happen. The things that we define by intuition are shouted down by the verbalists, the people who say, “Prove it.” But the proof is in the pudding. You can get a scientific doctor who can’t cure you, and then somebody like a savant idiot comes along and patches it up. [laughs, referring to himself]

sn2-10:46

This is very important because when you’re into self-definition – the possibility that you have an interior or surviving self, or that there’s a dimension that you enter after you die, or you have an experience and come back, and you know beyond a shadow of a doubt that you lived beyond that experience – this can only be done if you have intuition. Without this, everybody is looking for mundane things, they’re not looking for truths. The truths in this line are subjective now: the body’s no longer here, the body’s no longer conscious.

sn2-11:31

How many accounts do you hear of it? You’ll get them in Moody’s book, Life After Life.  These are starting to come out now. The reason they didn’t come out before was that people in the operating rooms, the nurses, the doctors, were told not to repeat the things that they heard in the hospital, because it would lead to arguments or maybe even lawsuits. That feeling is gone now. People are very curious about these things. One of the signs of an impending disaster is when people start getting interested in esoteric philosophy. They’ve had their religion with them for a hundred years but it didn’t answer the question. So, “Let’s go down to the witch doctor, see what he says, just for the hell of it.” 

sn2-12:46

Q. At this point in your life what do you hope to achieve? What motivates you? 

R. The approaching death. I’m trying to do something before I die.

Q. When you say, “because of approaching death,” do you mean your purpose is more self-caring as opposed to altruistic?

sn2-12:22

R. No, no. I know what’s going to happen to me. I’m just saying I’d like to run across some real people before I die, that’s all.

Q. How do you recognize a pure state of spirituality as opposed to intuitive or intellectual development?

R. Spiritual development can’t be tied in with physical or mental development. It’s invisible. Again, we’re going into definition – what you or somebody in this audience would define as spiritual and the way I define it. My idea of spiritual development is a person who is aware of their essence. To merely sit around and declare that God exists because he’s in Genesis isn’t spiritual with me. That’s make-believe. You can’t tell a spiritual person from their looks. Because they’re like savant idiots. If he’s truthful and honest he’ll be himself; he won’t be a hypocrite. So if he looks like a slug and talks like a slug, you’ll think he’s a slug. But he may be spiritual; he may understand himself. And that becomes apparent as soon as you start talking to them.

=== Paul Wood ===

sn2-15:06

I met a man one time by the name of Paul Wood,  from Texas. At this time I was going up to meetings in Akron. We had some people there who had graduated from Alcoholics Anonymous and now were on something of an esoteric or spiritual path. Incidentally, Bill Wilson,  the founder of Alcoholics Anonymous, was an enlightened man, although he was originally an alcoholic.  Anyhow, this group of people had met through Alcoholics Anonymous, and they would get together and were interested in spiritual work. 

sn2-15:47

This man from Texas came up to visit Bob Martin, the fellow I knew real well. ,   And he had been enlightened. He looked like Crazy Guggenheim,  the guy who used to be the sidekick for Jackie Gleason. This was a stocky fellow with eyes that sagged down, he was fat, a big heavy fellow, that’s the description of him. But that doesn’t matter. To look at him you wouldn’t have thought he was anything. You’d think he had spent a lot of time drinking, which he did, before he had this experience. 

They had brought a bunch over from Firestone or Goodyear or those places. Some of the engineers heard about him being in town, so they came over to look at him through the glass and see if he was crazy or not. And he was telling us about what happened. When the war broke out he was an engineering student, so they made him a pilot or something on a bomber, and his ship bombed Nagasaki or one of those places.  Now he was a Bible student before that, and he said it bugged him after he dropped the bombs. So his commanding officer said, “You’d better take a leave, a sabbatical, go home and get some rest.” He couldn’t see sending him out on another mission.

sn2-17:47

He said that what troubled him was that he had believed the Bible, and that this wasn’t coinciding with his beliefs. In the Bible it says that God observes the fall of the sparrow, and here’s a big bomber dropping tremendous eggs and killing people by the eighty thousand. “Where is this God I believed in?” So he came back to Texas, San Antonio I think it was. He was married and had some little children. And he couldn’t have any peace; he just became obsessed with finding that answer. He realized that he was troubled and he said, “The reason for my trouble is evidentially spiritual, and if I’m a fundamentalist I ought to go into the Bible and find the answer.”  

sn2-18:55

So he got to searching through the Bible and he found where Christ supposedly said (I’m quoting him, because I don’t read that much), “If you would have something granted to you, pray thusly,”   and what followed was the Lord’s Prayer. So he meditated, concentrated, analyzed the Lord’s Prayer twenty-four hours  day. He and his wife were quarreling because he wasn’t making any money. He got a job as a car salesman in a dealership but he wasn’t doing them much good; he was acting a little buggy. He said that he was just overwhelmed one day and he prayed for God to kill him. And he said he passed out.

sn2-19:46

When he woke up he was in a hospital. For ten days he travelled in space-time. All the time he was in the hospital he was conscious, while his body seemingly was unconscious. One amazing thing was that his trip doesn’t coincide with some of the other incidences of enlightenment. He was more like Swedenborg;   he could drop into almost any time category he wanted to. He’d be walking down the street with this friend of mine – Bob Martin used to relay a lot of this stuff to me – and he’d watch the battle of Gettysburg, or he’d watch something going on in Europe. He would describe it accurately, and then brush it aside as though it didn’t mean anything. But he somehow had gotten past time as being independent of space; that they are both one so to speak.

sn2-20:50

Well, the engineers from Firestone and Goodyear were kind of sneering at him. I didn’t say anything; I just watched him. And I came to the conclusion that he had been there. I knew it, just from what he was saying. And they started throwing questions at him: “Well, if you know so much, why aren’t you rich?” and all this sort of thing. They didn’t seem to get the importance of what he had become or discovered. We do not, incidentally, ever learn in this life anything of importance on a philosophic basis. We only become. And you never find God until you are God. That’s the simple answer.

sn2-21:51

But anyhow, they were ridiculing him. And he started telling a story. He had been going around trying to tell people to read the Lord’s Prayer, to get this enlightenment. Of course, it didn’t work, because not everybody was like him; they hadn’t bombed Japan. But he believed that he would be taken care of. He didn’t look for food. His wife had left him, the kids left him. So he got a little place by himself out in the country. And he said that every time he’d get to the point of starvation one of the ranchers who lived around there would bring in a quarter of beef or something for him to eat. They seemed to know he didn’t care whether he lived or died. 

He said that one time he was really down and out and had nothing to eat except an onion and a soup bone of some sort. And there were people there who had come to visit him. So he said, “All I’ve got is some broth.” And they said, “Okay.” So he cooks up this big pot of broth, and he said everybody ate it and seemingly they were satisfied. Of course the thought went through everybody’d head, “Oh, this fellow’s borrowing from the loaves and fishes parable and he’s going to capitalize on it.” And Bob says to him, “Paul, geez, I wish you hadn’t told that story. I’ve been telling these people how sincere you are.” And I looked over at Bob and said, “Bob, shut up. He doesn’t give a damn whether they believe it or not.” He told it because it was true, that’s all; he didn’t care if people believed it.

sn2-23:47

People want words, formulas. When you tell them about any spiritual experience they say, “Here’s a thousand dollars, can you do it in fifteen minutes? I’ve got to catch a bus.” And that’s the unfortunate direction most people have. But the only way the person can ever experience this is by going the same road and going through the same troubles, if that’s what it takes. Whatever it is. 

sn2-24:39

Q. What are you reading those questions from?

R. This is the most recent book the TAT Foundation has produced,  and in it are some of my writings. That’s a talk I gave, “The Lecture of Questions.” 

OPTIONAL:
Q. How would somebody get a copy of that?

R. The little man over there with the smile. [laughs] I shouldn’t say little, he’s as tall as I am.

Q. I like all the questions but I can’t pick out the most significant five.

sn2-25:16

R. Sure. You’d  have to sort through them, I know that.

Q. Your question, “Can you be free and at the same time be aware?” – this is something I have been struggling with.

sn2-25:34

R. I think you have to be free to be aware. There are a lot of things, once you get to figuring them out: for instance there’s humility. When I was in the seminary they were trying to teach everybody to be humble. Do you know what humility can do for you if you ever get thrown into jail? We have to have enough pride; you have to carry yourself with pride and self-protection to a point where you no longer need it. This is a jungle. We have to be realistic. You can’t be humble with animals. 

sn2-26:28

[Q rewritten by SH – partly inaudible]
Q. The more I try to be aware of what I’m doing, the less I seem to understand what’s real. I’m wondering if I’ll ever see it. 

R. Umm, don’t worry about it. Because what you’re doing basically is being your own therapist, and evidently not a good one, because it’s making you unhappy. By that I mean, whenever we start analyzing ourself we get to hate ourself, by our previous standards. There’s no great pride in being a human. If it causes disquiet, hey, when I had my experience I wept for a week. But it was the result of what I discovered. So don’t be dismayed if you have some unhappy moments. The happy ones are as much of a mirage as the unhappy ones. Except the happy ones are more deadly because they’ll trap you. The unhappy ones will only drive you away.

[part 3 ends]

sn2-27:53
=== Forum Part 4 ===

[long question to shortened]

Q. You were talking about intuition – it all seems to be a very big struggle, continual conflict. I’ve resigned myself to the fact that there will be continual conflict. The other part is feeling like, “How do I know I’m right?” How do you know you’re not just in a state of imagination? Or do I have something that possibly intruded. A feeling of priority or something. A lot of times, usually I question. I feel this is the direction I should go. ?? ?? the opposition to self conflict? complex? ?? the fact for questions ?? “Is that imagination?” How do you distinguish imagination from what you wish? 

=== More on intuition ===
[shortened question]
Q. You were talking about intuition. How do you distinguish imagination from something that is what you wish? 

 
sn2-28:57

R. Well, imagination is just associations; it’s nothing more than a free running of associations. But your intuition is a becoming. It’s like growing a new faculty.  And it can only be done by a protected lifestyle. You have to protect yourself.

Q. What do you mean by that?

R. I don’t want to explain it to you right now, because there are two sexes here. Women are born with intuition, but it kind of runs wild; it can get haywire. But a woman is much more sensitive. And I go back to anthropology if you want to call it that. And that the reason the woman was gifted with it was that she had to raise the young, which were helpless; and she had to be able to make an instant decision on how to protect their lives against a predator. Whereas the man – that wasn’t his concern so much as much as protecting the wife, or just defending himself. So he developed a logical system, of getting a sharper ax to chop up the enemy with.

sn2-30:13

The thing is that in the female the intuition does run wild sometimes. I’ve seen women who when their husband was in a beer joint, they knew exactly which beer joint he was in. They’d just see it. There was a picture, and maybe call on the phone and get him at the right place. And then they’d become proud of that or really thought they had something, and then they’d make a fatal mistake in judgment as a result of listening to their intuition.


I’ll say this much to you. It boils down to this, that you can check it.  Now whether you can enlarge on it, or excel in it, by checking it – but you can check your intuition and you should. Everybody should perpetually check their intuition. Each checking of course is germane to whatever problem you’re on.

sn2-31:12

Q. [very faint, sounds like leakage from another track]

R. See some people – I’ve heard people say – You’ll run across people like this. There was a truck driver who was telling me he had a voice once in a while that would speak to him, and he would always listen to it.  But one time he didn’t. It wasn’t a wreck; I think the trucker’s union was fighting somebody and they were trying to hit him. And they did. He said he was going around this truck full of bricks and he heard the voice – it called him by name – it said, “Duck.” But he said he ignored it, and got hit in the head with a brick. But I have watched him over the years follow that intuition, a voice that spoke to him. Now I don’t understand why the voice, but I don’t argue with it as long as it’s giving him information. Intuition doesn’t necessarily mean a voice is going to speak to you, although it did to him. But he was checking it out; he wanted proof. So he got hit checking it out.

sn2-32:34

Q. Do you have different states when you can have more or less intuition?

R. Intuition takes you to different states, to higher states. You can’t travel that road unless you have the intuitional guide. Logic is absolutely no good. If you notice the tone of the readings is that we think we’re operating so much by logic, but we don’t know the human mind. People are practicing psychology and psychiatry who can’t define thought. And this should be against the law. That’s their stock in trade and they should know what they’re talking about.

While someone else can come along and heal people; and maybe he doesn’t know how he does it, but he knows that if he keeps his head in a certain way, things will happen. So what’s wrong with that, even though he doesn’t have a license? As long as he’s not harming. Not only that, but you can’t tell what he might avoid, some physical operation, through what he’s taking care of by those means.

sn2-33:50

One time somebody said to me – they had heard that these things happened around me – they said, “Why don’t you heal people?” You can only do one thing in your life. You shouldn’t focus on too many different things. Number one, I think that people should first try to heal themselves; find the cause, quit doing what’s making you sick, stop it. Go into another direction. But the main thing is that you do get powers – there are powers that come to you – and they surprised me. I was amazed when they first started happening. But I made up my mind not to use them, because I have one objective, that’s the maximum. I’m going for the maximum potential for people, not necessarily where they’ve got to take off a wart, or to stop their bleeding or something like that.

sn2-34:53

I wrote a letter one time to Kathryn Kuhlman.  I don’t know whether you’ve heard of her. She was a healer; she was on the radio for years and years out of Pittsburgh. So I wrote her a letter, I said, “How do you operate?” And she wrote back; she said, “I don’t do anything.” Of course at that time if you claimed to be a healer you could get sued or the government could stop you, the same as practicing medicine without a license for going into the business of healing people. So the unfortunate part about it, when she said that, you couldn’t really believe whether she was telling you the truth, or whether she thought you were a detective trying to see if she’s charging for healing people.

sn2-35:49

But there is a – in other words, it’s almost like 
[Whatever it is:] If you want to become a millionaire you can become a millionaire, starting young enough; some people have done it later in life. But it’s total dedication to something. And if you want to be a mathematician you can do that, by total application. But you can’t do two or three or five little things with it.

sn2-36:22

Q. What if you find that through your life you positioned yourself to whatever factors [took you] to where you’re at where you’re at now, and all of a sudden you realize that that’s not what you’re supposed to do? You feel like that, if it’s the real gestalt that you should go with that? Or if you feel that, that it’s not you  ?? ?? even if you know better?  

R. If you have any intuition, that there is a certain path that you should follow or a certain thing that you should do, follow that intuition. Follow it come hell or high water. That’s anything, whether it’s making money or anything. Of course, I didn’t choose money. When I was a kid I went away to be a priest, and if I had wanted to get rich I surely wouldn’t have gone there. Although my dad said you get free wine. But that was my objective, and I thought I’ll keep at it. You do get [doubts]. When I started to go bald I started looking for a girl. I thought, “Hell, nobody’s going to have this guy if he gets too bald.” 

sn2-37:40

Q. And you’ve always been on a spiritual path ever since? 

R. Ever since I was a kid.

Q. You didn’t go down one path and suddenly change?

R. No, I –

Q. Things? did? not? produce? it?

R. Yes, I had a - I was lucky. I was lucky. I had good parents, that’s one thing. I had good parents. They kept me clean. And of course that may be something another individual will have to fight out for themselves; they’ll have to protect themselves more.

sn2-38:20 

[long 1 minute question to shorten]

Q. All these stories, or your situation – Augie explained this, this fellow dropping bombs on Nagasaki, all of these things that have something in common, since you really have a need for courage, also including the desire to know something. A lot of people have an interest to know something, you know, like studying the new physics and the power of positive thinking, meditation and that type of thing. But it’s not, I’m not necessarily needing an answer to whether there is life after death and all of those things. It’s interesting to have a perspective on. Maybe I need to know those things, but it’s not a burning desire. You had a burning desire, other people did. Can you really study, in say your situation, or just having an interest rather than a burning desire that I need to know, to alter my state?

[shortened question follows:]

=== Determination ===

Q. A lot of people have an interest to know something, like studying meditation or the new physics. I’m not necessarily needing an answer to whether there is life after death and all those things, although it’s interesting to have a perspective on them. You had a burning desire, and other people did as well. Can I study, just having an interest rather than a burning desire, in order to alter my state?

sn2-39:16

R. Well, in the first place, I don’t think you can think about any subject, whether it’s philosophic, spiritual or metaphysical, without going to the root. It’s just like – you’re chasing back – you go back – if you want to know something about meditation, for instance, there’s a lot of material written on meditation. And some people think meditation is sitting around thinking about girls. Or, you know, just having peace. 

To give you an example, the TM   formula for meditation was to pronounce a word, a sonorous word that ended mostly in “ng”. Boing, boing, boing. Now this had a pacifying effect on the individual body and mind. But you can’t advance with that. You’re taking somebody’s word for it, people supposed to be experts. You’ve got to know for yourself. You’ve got to be suspicious even. How many of these fellows are phony?

sn2-40:31

One of the symptoms you have to watch for – it’s really unfair to say this, because rich men could also be enlightened – but, if they’ve got money, why did they go to the bother, if there was a greater value? So there are little things that are almost like symptoms, to look for a disease. But in the business of chasing anything back, meditation will happen automatically. Like with those questions. If you start answering those questions you’ll be meditating. You’ll think, “Wow, I never thought of that. So let’s think about it.”

sn2-41:16

But there’s no point – as I said, there’s no point in thinking unless you know who’s thinking. There’s no point in tolerating thoughts if they’re caused by outside entities. So if you’re studying thought, if it’s only meditation, you’ve got to analyze thought: “What is thought? “ You find out that you can’t control it. Your mind takes off in a certain direction; it’s like a goat when it gets downwind on another goat at breeding time. We’re attracted. Our mind’s attracted to certain pleasures and things. So we’ve got to bypass that and say, “Hey, where in the hell did I come from? And what happens to me?”

[ side sn2 ends at 42:04

== File sn3 ==
File 3 – length 46:12 

=== Truth ===
[break in tape, question is missing]]

[question missing – dm version, bm version, ps version]

00:00

Yes, but what is it, basically? We know it’s iron, but what’s iron? Well, it’s molecules. What are molecules? They’re atoms. What are atoms? They’re force fields. What are force fields? Mental power. That’s the best definition they’ve come up with yet, that force fields are composed of mental power. I mentioned the photons: if you read The Dancing Wu Li Masters,  these photons are intelligent. They convey messages to each other at the speed, or faster than the speed of light. Boy, if we ever get on to this, nobody will be able to cheat on their income tax.

Q. At that point we won’t worry about anybody [inaudible]

R. Right, right.

Q. In physics they have had experiments where an electron appears from nowhere and disappears to nowhere.  It’s obvious they came from someplace, but you can’t tell where the entrance or the exit is.

sn3-01:11

R. I’ll give you an example: just recently in the last twenty years   they’ve come up with the black hole in space theories. Which they claim are real, that they can observe them out in the distance. Now Blavatsky,  the founder of Theosophy, practically, writes of the old texts from back in Tibet and China, in which they measured time by the yugas, which I think are 360,000 years.  And they talked of the great inbreathing and the outbreathing of the universe. Now this is utterly amazing for people who had no telescopes even, two thousand or three thousand years ago. But they had a composite – not just one little remark they made – but a whole composite thing about time. And they had it in tremendously greater eras – the yuga was 360,000 years, and then those were divided into smaller components. But they recognized back then, the black holes in space: the outbreathing [manifestation] of the universe and the inbreathing, the period of pralaya.   [dissolution]

sn3-02:41

So this had to come about by – my understanding, and the only thing I can think of – either somebody came down in a fiery chariot and said, “Here’s what’s upstairs,” or else their intuition developed it. And I think if you – what you can do, if a person is a – I’ve always been more of a scientific mind. I realize that science is a snake with its tail in its mouth, meaning it goes nowhere. Because the truth in science years ago is now no longer the truth. 

I studied under the valence theory   in chemistry; now they’ve got something else. So the truths of yesterday are changing with knowledge. But there’s a basic observation that you can make, when things happen according to a certain pattern, that indicates that it’s not what it’s cracked up to be. You know, we’ve got a theory. This is what we don’t take into consideration. All science today is composed of theories; even Einstein’s relativity was a theory, it wasn’t proven. At the time he brought it forth it was just a mathematical theory.

sn3-04:06

I say everybody is looking for the truth. You go down to the steel mill and they’re all trying to make a better grade of steel; they’re trying new alloys and all sorts of things. That’s truth. But once a person starts after truth in any field, it has to go back to basics: Who’s looking at the steel? Who can you trust? When I was a kid I went to church and I thought these people were infallible, you know. They’re not infallible, they’re making a living. Consequently, I’ve got to go and find out for myself, that’s all.

So you read a bunch of books. And you get a place in the country; get away completely, go out there and sit and think. And the coordination occurs then. You run the rubbish past the screen again, until you sort out something that’s less rubbish.

The process of  the discovery of truth is not by direct attack upon knowledge. It’s caused by backing away from error. We have no direct road to truth. The only thing we can do is build a road away from nonsense, garbage. And as you do that, you do it with your life. Certain things that you do, you should say, “This is garbage. There’s no reason for me doing this; it’s taking my energy.” You back away from it, you think clearly. You quit smoking, you quit drinking, quit acting like an animal. And then you can think. And you don’t have to go to church; all you have to do is sit down and think about it inside yourself, and you know it.

06:00

I think [this is] the whole path. I don’t pretend to be a religious person. I had nothing but bad write-ups for them. I studied to be a priest, and I’m glad I got out as young as I did. I was only about seventeen when I finally broke out. I hunted the gurus and I found the gurus were just a fancier shade of clipsters. I mean, a lot of them. A lot of them. But of course, we’re a nation that loves clipsters. We love to believe the impossible. I couldn’t hardly believe this. I was out in California one time, and there was a woman out there who had a tremendous congregation; her name was Claire Prophet.  And I kind of sensed that she was as phony as a three dollar bill. So I talked to a fellow out there who knew her and I said, “How can that woman get out there with no knowledge, no message, and indoctrinate all those people?” She had a great big spread out there on Mulholland Drive, and they’d come out there every Sunday and she was making millions off of them.

07:20

And I said, you know, “You try to be honest with people and it gets nowhere. But here she’s telling you, ‘’Oh, we’re all going to be happy together.” It’s hoopla. And he looked at me and he said, “She followed a simple rule of thumb of business: don’t advertize your losses.” In other words, if you have a bad showing, you only had a hundred people show up, tell them you had five thousand. Because then, four thousand people come out to see the five thousand, and then you’ll have four thousand the next time.

sn3-08:03

So I’ve done this all my life; I have gone into every cult that I thought was halfway sensible. I don’t have bad words for all of them, believe me. There are some of them that are nonprofit, they don’t make any money. And I never believed that a person should live off another man’s money. Just like myself: I’m retired, but I was a contractor, and I didn’t get to write any books until I was fifty years of age because I was busy raising a family. But I never charged for anything except for the light bill. You know, we’d have meetings and say, “Let’s chip in and pay the light bill,” or whatever; they rent you the room, or something like that.

But I made up my mind that I would never keep a preacher and I would never charge. Because that’s the only way you can look people in the eye. Everybody in the country knows what’s going on: this is the day of the million-dollar grab. They don’t grab hundred dollar bills anymore, they grab millions when they go. We’ve got a Pure Food and Drug law, but we have no law against lying in psychology and religion. 

And thank God there are no checks and balances on it, because then we’d be killing each other. If we don’t let the liars get away with it the same as the honest people, why then there’d be bloodbaths. So it’s a necessary evil I guess. It serves its purpose. Not everything’s bad. Some people lean and they can only lean. There are other people who fight. I chose to fight. And I turned all my meanness into determination.

10:15

Q. Like there have to be conservatives for there to be liberals.


R. Yeah, it’s a relative dimension, yeah.
=== Stages ===
Q.  As far as some people having out of body experiences or being able to receive history, like that fellow in Texas – everybody’s different so everybody’s going to sense reality or sense knowledge in a different way.

R. No, the funny thing is, when certain things occur, there’s a common denominator. That’s the reason I understood the man. Let’s say he sees a certain section of history: General Lee and General Grant are in their graves, they’re not out there in front of him, but he’s watching them. So if you analyze that for a minute, he’s analyzing something that’s presented to him. Just the same as we’d see a picture of Lee and Grant, or some movie star who’s dead. That isn’t Clark Gable; the man’s no longer here. But people react according to a multi-colored filter, you might say. And they react differently. But the key thing is always the same.

sn3-11:35

There are different experiences and they come in different levels. Gurdjieff  had way of categorizing: the instinctive man, the emotional man, the logical man (the scientist and mathematician) and the philosophic man.  ,   The instinctive man is a person who lives to live. He’s sanguine   and he loves to eat, to drink, to have sex, to laugh, to be boisterous and so on. And that’s life to him; it’s like the puppies bouncing around over the woods. And he or she is very selfish.

Then the emotional man is the step above that. And that’s when this instinctive man gets religion or falls in love. If he gets religion, Christ is his lover. He finds something greater than himself. And only when a man finds something greater than himself does this ego of all this fun-making disappear, or it diminishes. Now he’s elevated on a different plane and he feels better for it. And if he falls in love he feels there’s nothing as significant as the other person. Now when I say “he” in this instance, it applies to women as well. I don’t like to go through this paranoid routine of naming all the sexes, all six of them.

sn3-13:22

And of course after he languishes in this love thing for awhile: he loves his children and he thinks his children love him as much as he loves them. But the kids grow up and kick him in the face, and the wife kicks him out and gets a younger man or whatever. Then he realizes that he’s been projecting values instead of actually seeing them, actually knowing them. He realizes he’s being used by nature and he’s no longer needed by nature. So then maybe he gets another form of religion before he dies; and that’s where he gets the emotional religion. He becomes a born-again Christian or something, or he goes to a guru and throws himself at the feet of the guru.

sn3-14:10

But when he transcends that emotional thing, then he says, “This is all nonsense; I’m going back and I’m going to analyze the Bible and prove it right or wrong,” or, ‘I‘m going to make a liar out of this preacher.” Or, “I’ll find out who’s telling the truth. And I’ll get into something that’s scientific, instead of something that’s believing.” So what does he do? He becomes an astrologer, or he becomes a numerologist. Because he considers those to be hard figures he can work with. And maybe he can find through studying astrology, who made the zodiac, the first one. And ultimately, after many years of that, he finds out that that was an ego trip: he’s proud of his brain and he thinks he’s going to do all this with his brain.

So the next step then is – you don’t know where to go, so you look under every rock. You just start examining all the religions of the world. This book, Profound Writings East and West   ,    is excerpts of the ancient books, and the reason we put it together is that they’re individually not available. I had a hard time all my life trying to find the Platform Sutra,  for instance, or the Upanishads. And these are writings that take you clear back to where the first con games were played. Of course, there are different stories of enlightenment. There‘s the poetry of Francis Thompson,  an Englishman, who had as profound or more profound enlightenment as any yogi in Tibet. He was a devout Christian, but he was also a devout drunk. And trauma brought him through. Years ago I knew a married couple   here in Columbus, and I used to spend time talking to them about Bill Wilson, the founder of Alcoholics Anonymous. Elegant Sayings was another one, Himalayas of the Soul,  The Voice of the Silence,  the Bhagavad Gita. Those are the ancient ones.

sn3-16:53

It shows you that what those people were thinking back then. It makes us almost ashamed that we’re piddling with what we’re piddling with. Those people didn’t have the mathematical education, they had very little scientific knowledge, two thousand years before Christ, but they had a profound philosophy. And strangely enough, the more complicated our technology develops, the greater our egos, collective and individual become. We think that we’re powerful people, that we’re going to change society – that’s the big thing. We will only change that which was already planned to be changed, or to change itself. The only thing we can do is predict it; we’ll not change anything.

sn3-18:02

Q. So you’re saying that if the observer is thinking, who’s observing the observer?

R. What?

Q. If you observe your own thinking, who or what is doing the observing? What’s your take on that?

18:17

R. That’s a question I wanted you to answer. But don’t you get the point? Doesn’t that pose to you that there are two people? That there’s a schizoid thing, but it’s a good schizoid thing if you’re getting a profit from it. What happened to me in Seattle when I went out the window, so to speak – I saw myself back on earth. Now I’m not saying it was accurate, but this was an amazing thing. From where I was, I couldn’t see my feet, but I knew I was watching. So which is the real observer? The real observer was the man who was watching. And when you become an observer, when you start to watch your actions, you’re starting to watch the animal, and you become what is the opposite of the animal.

19:27
[start long question to be condensed]
Q. What good does it do for you to ?? going on in college ?? When we can’t, it seems like everything you’re saying ?? we’re not going to understand or believe ??

R. I can’t hear you too well.

19:46

Q. It seems like everything I’m hearing, it’s just kind of brushing the surface, and what we’re all not going to understand – if we are to understand the meaning of what you’re talking about, until we actually ?? ?? ?? and reach enlightenment or however you want to put it.

[condensed question follows]

Q. What good does it do to tell us this? It seems like everything I’m hearing is just kind of brushing the surface, and we’re not going to understand what you’re talking about anyway until we actually reach enlightenment.

sn3-19:59

R. This can’t be communicated in words. We can do this for two solid years, if we could go without eating and sleeping, and you wouldn’t learn anything, just talking. But when you’re face to face with it you’ll know it. Now again, that sounds like I’m brushing the surface. But I can show you, introduce you to people who had one second of contact, or just a few seconds of contact: they knew. That’s the way it happens. And that happens in any of these experiences. You don’t learn, you become.

sn3-20:48

See, what you’re almost demanding of me, is that you allow yourself to be distracted by life, and then you say to me, “Why don’t you make sense?” And I say, “Why don’t you quit being distracted by life, and become sense?” Then, when your mind is prepared to receive, then it will open up, and when somebody says something you’ll see the honesty and the truth behind it. And the next time, another door opens up. It’s a progressive thing. The reason for the koan, as they say in Zen, is that nobody believes what they’re told. They say, “Give me proof.” And I can only say, “Make your life a search for truth.” Don’t say, “Give it to me.” It can’t be given. You can’t get it like a possession; you have to become it. When man knows God, he is God.

21:49

Q. That’s what I mean. But can we understand it by getting it from other people?

R. You are getting it. This is as close as you may get. There ain’t too many of us around.

[Forum Part 4 ends]

=== Forum Part 5 ===
sn3-22:07

Q. Don’t you think the difference between like these out-of-body experiences and say dreams or even an astral trip that ... ?

R. I’m going to tell you something. The acid trip is a departure from the outside ego. And some of the people who – for instance Paul [last name?] – I met Paul about ten years ago, and some of the people who had taken just a little bit, maybe not become addicted, who had been into acid and seen another dimension, and through that dimension they realized that it was as good as this one. And not because it was pleasurable, but because it was real – there was some message, they don’t know how to decipher because they didn’t go into it with the idea of deciphering it.

22:58

But when they say that – [whether it was] pot – sometimes it will affect people – garbled syllables – I don’t think it goes for the heavy drugs; IP think the heavy drugs are strictly destructive. But Timothy Leary  for instance – some of those guys were psychiatrists  and stuff – they said, “Hey, this is the cure. This is it. This is the truth.” 

23:21

Well, it wasn’t. But one thing it certainly was, it showed that there was a dimension besides this relative dimension that we labor in now. And with that as a background, they said, “Tell me more. What’s – show me how to get into ...”

Now if they weren’t too deep, if they weren’t too completely blasted – and that meant that – I saw that, in 1972, I saw that the door would open for some people. And I said this is the time to go out to the universities and see how many I can salvage.

23:57

Because they had – that type of dope was an intuitional thing. It’s an intuitional thing. It’s confused – it’s a confusing thing but still it’s intuitional. But it doesn’t come in the English language. There’s no explanation that comes with the package.

There’s somebody over there ...

24:16

Q. ??

R. The ultimate observer is God. Now “God” is a word. Now God in my estimation – if you want to take it as fiction, or whatever you want to take it as – is the ultimate destiny of man – hopefully every man. But it’s not the totality. It’s not the totality. And I can’t tell you what – if there is any – I was just talking about it earlier – that when this happened I realized that I was a total consciousness. And I thought, “This is everything. This is everything. What is nothing?” And I fell into an abyss. I thought, “Oh, oh. This is nothing.” And wound up back in the hotel room. Where I – I came back to my consciousness then, my mundane consciousness.

25:26

Q. What organ or part of body do you think the soul of man resides? The heart, the head?

R. None of them. None of them. There’s certain parts – you have to – see that has shifted down through the centuries. The Greeks used to think it was in the liver. And then of course – I think they thought it because the – once they found the heart, then when you stab a guy in the heart he died, well that must have been his life center. But basically, your real life is outside your body, in my estimation.

26:09

We have a – again, I’m going by analysis of operations and that sort of thing. You can have a man – whereas repeated? – my kid brother  had a – they were operating on him. And he saw everybody there, and when he came back he described the operation to the doctor.  And not only that, his wife – she was a rabid Holy Roller, I don’t know what you’d call her – and he was raised a Catholic. So when they called to find out what religion he was, they said they didn’t expect him to live – I told them he was raised a Catholic and he’d probably want a priest.

27:00

And it was out in the desert, near an Army base, so they called and got a Catholic chaplain to come out and give him the ;last rites. And when he got there, [my brother’s] wife was anti-priest: her religion believes that all priests are demons and devils. So she started cursing him out right there at the bedside, trying to drive him out. And [my brother] knew all of that – watched, knew their motions they went through and everything, and told them.

27:31

So consequently – the only reason I’m going through this is – this means, and Moody’s book  – get some of this material and read it, because Moody is factual. He had something on Geraaldo Rivera’s show  – he had a little show on there about four or five people who survived death. And it was interesting because they fall into certain categories. It’s like I was mentioning before: when a guy recovers from a certain type of life, he’ll tell a different kind of experience – it seems to be peculiar to his – whether he’s instinctive or logical or whatever it is.

28:16

But these fellows manifested something, of memory. Moody himself was astrally projected, if you want to call it that – he claims it was like a death experience. You remember where you were, you remember what you look like, you remember what the streets look like. And he said that when he was travelling over the streets in this town, he recognized people who he knew, on the sidewalk. And checked with them – he could check them out later. He knew where – he was headed to Washington DC, he said; he know what to expect. 

28:55

This means that that fellow carried his synapses with him, seemingly. His synapses are in his head; if he’d have died, you would have thought he had been blotto, that there wouldn’t have been any thoughts. But he still thinking. 

So this means that there’s a correlation, or correlated double – that the stuff that you learn in this life is also deposited in an astral or spiritual (the same) memory bank, the same as it’s in this bank.

29:28

So consequently, that – we realize that memory can transcend death.

29:38

And just like what’s his name – Wood – when he was conjuring up the battle of Gettysburg – of course, the only way to check would have been to get some evidence of stuff he saw.

29:57

But there is evidence, there’s a lot of evidence now that we pass out and we see things with our eyes shut. Unconscious, medically dead, even. Those guys in this Geraaldo show – I can’t pronounce his name – the guy who got his nose broke for getting into politics. But those people had a common thing: two of them said that they passed through a tunnel, and at the end of the tunnel there was a bright light. One of them said that the light was God. the other one said that there was a man there, which he considered an angel, that was leading him into another dimension, another field.

30:42

And – did any of you see that [show]? There was a lady there,  I don’t know whether she was a psychiatrist or what, but she made the remark, she said that the greatest enemy to all of this spiritual investigation are the federal-funded psychiatrists and psychologists. She said it [they] seem to be trained to writing this down as the disease of the mind, and that anybody who survives death should be forced to have psychiatric care.  This is almost like in the days when they fought wars over religion. Nuts? ?? experiment.

31:28

Q. After you went? to the ultimate, I was in a bookstore, and I asked him? if he had read one of your books. And he said ?? ?? ?? Richard Rose. And I said ?? And he said, “Well, you don’t really consider ?? a true Zen master.” What do you think of that?

Q2. What bookstore was that?

R. What’s his name? I’ll tell you his name.

Q. It was one of those – west side.

R. Yeah, that’s him, duplex. He offered very graciously one time – see, at one time he was some kind of authority in the local Theosophical Society here. And somebody moved in, I think his name was Sivert, and took over. And he went back to his bookstore. And he made the remark to me – I met him in Pittsburgh – he made the remark to me, “Well, I’d like to hear you speak, Mr. Rose, and if I like what you say, we’ll invite you over to the Theosophical Society for a talk.” he was a rather pompous guy. So I hope he didn’t like my talk; I didn’t want to go to his Theosophical Society under pressure.

33:01

Q. ?? life after death ??

R. I don’t know about Shirley MacLaine,  but believe me, it seems like a long drag if that Ramtha  guy took 26,000 years to learn English. 

Q. You disbelieve all that stuff?

R. Oh, this is the age of creation – create anything. And the bigger the lie, the better. The public will believe the biggest lie.

33:36

And if you’re wealthy then he must know something; so the wealthier you get the better you are. But it’s like crystals – anybody [who] can pay attention to crystals the way people are doing today is a – it doesn’t say much for evolvement or evolution. Believe me, the desert rats out in California two hundred years ago would have known something about the beneficial values of crystals, because they had to dig through them to find gold. They chose the gold.

34:12

But anyhow, it’s just the idea that we’re in a creative – we’re trying to create God in our own image and likeness: “God wouldn’t do that, because it would be unjust.” God might like to eat humans – how do they know, until they know what his essence is? He’s supposed to act like us. He created us in his own image and likeness, and we were created in the image and likeness of monkeys – it goes way back – and dogs, perhaps.

34:48

So you have to – people are lazy-minded, lazy-minded. They can’t help iy. Sometimes it takes every hour of your day to make a living. so what can you do? But I can’t see endorsing every – in fact, one thing I’ll say is that every movement on this earth answers a question for somebody. that’s important. Now I’m not saying that everybody goes down the same way [path]. In other words, what may be an instinctive man by some emotional religion, guru-deal, or something like that – is lifted out of his puddle, and he becomes a better person. And I’ve seen people who have quit drinking – like the formula for getting cured of drinking is to find somebody whom you can dedicate yourself to, instead of yourself; get off your ego trip. so you pick Jesus Christ – nothing wrong with that.

36:01

So – then you’ve got people who are a little bit more scientific and they become Spiritualists.  But I made my rounds of the Spiritualist phenomena, and I found some genuine phenomena; genuine – but they didn’t answer the questions I talked to those entities – they materialized, they were genuine, materialized – right here in Columbus, a place called White Lilly Chapel in Delaware, Ohio, right up the road, north of here.

36:36

I saw them materialize. Some of them were supposed to be relatives of [?] dead people. [But] you talk to them and they didn’t have any answers. Except, “Yes, yes.” “Is my brother Joe  there?” “Yes, yes, he’s here. he says hello.” Well, go to hell, Joe, I wanted something more than that. [laughs] 

37:02

We had a fellow in Wheeling who went to a Spiritualist church – he had lost his – he had worked in a brokerage hose, and he had rolled up close to a quarter of a million dollars. His girlfriend was working there, and she had got, you know, a little bit of inside-trading information and got a little bit, maybe forty thousand. And back in the depression days that was worth a lot of money.

So what happened was, the head of their brokerage office took their stock – they borrowed it to sell it to somebody, figuring they’d replace it. That’s what they do when you’re selling short, with somebody else’s stock.  But they just took their stock out of the till and sold it. And instead of it bouncing back up as he expected, it went down, or it went up, I can’t remember which – and he couldn’t get it back, couldn’t raise the money. So they lost it.

37:54

This guy’s name was Hazlett, the head of the brokerage firm. So this man actually at the age of sixty was broke, he was wanting to get married to this girl who had worked in the brokerage house for twenty or forty [thirty?] years, and they couldn’t get married; they didn’t have even the price of the ring.

38:09

So he was very bitter about Hazlett. So he said he went to a Spiritualist thing. And I think a lot of time, ever you ever read Spraggett – there’s a guy name Allen Spraggett  who wrote a book on Spiritualism,  about the one out here – it’s a muckraking of [Camp] Chesterfield [in] Indiana.  I’ve been there, and what he says is very, very accurate. 

What was it he said? Anyhow he went there and said – some guy must have done some research and found out he had a friend by the name of Hazlett, that had run this brokerage firm. Wheeling is a small town, you know. So he said, “Oh, we’ve got a spirit here that wants to talk to you.” He said, “Yeah? That’s good.” And he said, “It’s a man named John. He says he knows you.” He said, “I don’t know anybody by the name of John. Can’t think of anybody by the name of John.”  “Yeah” – he had to make it good, he knew it was Hazlett. “Well, his last name is something like Hazelnut.” “Hazlett.” “Yeah, yeah,” is what the spirit said.

39:19

So – “Oh, John Hazlett! Tell him to go to hell!”  [laughs] Here’s a guy who had died, you know, and owed him a million bucks, or a quarter million, when he died. So he got to tell the pseudo-spirit off at least.

39:42

Q. You had mentioned  little earlier, about the LSD trip where ?? ?? childrn maybe a different religion than from? the? root? their mom and dad?? 
???
If you have a really – for example I was having a really vivid dream that didn’t?? seem relevant to anything I may have experienced. They seem very ?? real ??

40:12

R. Well, because I don’t know the exact thing that occurred to you I can’t say. But I’ll tell you, you have to be cautious about tokens or – checking your intuition so to speak. If we get totally dependent on a certain line of information like that you’ll get fed false information, sometimes, for? any? wreck? you.

40:39

As I said, if you can see for a little moment the fact that we are basically – this is an agricultural setup; we’re here for fertilization, we’re here for keeping the human race going. And why are we here for keeping the earth green, fertilized, and that sort of thing? – what purpose? – we don’t know. The average person doesn’t know.

So consequently there’s an inclination to buck the harness, get out of the harness – let’s quit feeding the fertilization process. And when you do that, immediately, whether it’s programming or another line of – whoever is profiting from the [our] loss of energy will start to put ideas in your head. And you’ve got to be able to credit, you know, find out where they’re coming from.

Some people will actually hear voices, and they think, “Oh, that must be a spiritual [thing].” Ha. Be careful. It’s better if you don’t hear them.

41:50

Q. ??

R. Well, they used to call it instinct, with animals; the animal had an instinct.

Q. ??

R. Well, I wouldn’t say that the animal instincts are negating; I think in some respects the animal has it all over us Because we’re cursed with language; the animal isn’t. The animal has correct impressions. They risk their life on it: the deer goes in to drink with the lion, only when she knows the lion’s belly is full. That’s the instinct. But that’s an intuition that saves their life.

42:42

But intuition – you’ll know it. It isn’t a mundane – you know – to give you an example, like I said, there are people who know, who have got an intuition when the husband’s in the beer joint. They’ll even call and get the right beer joint. You don’t want to gauge your life on that power – it won’t work all the time, you’ll go into a real trap sometime.

43:09

But the intuition about your correct mental thinking is what I’m talking about. Because this mental thinking – the esoteric business is subjective, it’s not tangible, you can’t put it in a test tube. So consequently it has to be tested and very subtle and carefully thought-out methods, to see if you’re going in the right path.

Of course, I really believe that intention – my feeling is that you don’t have to do much checking or anything like that: if your intentions are right. If your intentions are right, you’ll automatically put a watchdog in the computer.

44:01

That’s the reason I say that it’s very important if a person is on what we refer to as a spiritual path that they keep their ego out. And you can’t do things for money if you’ve got – when you get money into it then you’ve got an ego into it. So there’s always a danger that you’re going to start and try to – number one, I don’t believe in trying to convince people, I believe that there are certain people – certain people may be, perhaps, sitting here tonight who have a destiny ahead of them in this regard. And if that’s true, they’ll ultimately know it, and they’ll take action.

But as far as to sell a fellow a bill of goods – I will, like I said – I read that thing purposefully because I think it gives you a new perspective on many subjects that people never think about. About things that we define, such as pleasure, and right and wrong, and that sort of thing.

45:03

Q. ??

R. I really didn’t hear you – I don’t know if it’s my ears or ...

Q. ??

45:22

R. Conditioning? Conditioning is the enemy. I don’t know if I mentioned this before – I was talking about the Sufi book – was I telling you about that? Maybe not. Sufism is an old – it’s almost like Zen, in the Arab countries. This is a book put out by Idries Shah, and he was quoting one of those old prophets or whatever you call them. And I was amazed at the wording – he even used the word “conditioning” – as the worst enemy of mankind, is conditioning. 

In other words, we take a pure and simple soul, called a baby, and we start right along with them, to condition them, to get them to believe certain ...

[ end of tape 3 ]

== File 4 ==
File 4 – 29 minutes. 

00:00

... [the parents have to] keep the kid out of the penitentiary. We’ve got to live in the sardine can. So consequently you have go be conditioned to live in a sardine can. So you’ve got to transform that kid into some kind of a pretzel.

In my estimation, a child is born with the memory of God, or the previous essence. And he’s also born with a tremendous intuition, because they can learn real fast whether to trust you or not. They can also learn real fast where their dinner is. But the older that child gets, the more it is seduced by education until it thinks that it has to believe everything. I remember – I used to [work for] be in the Navy  but I ran into some guys in the Army one time, and one of them was a sergeant. And he kept saying, “You better believe it, you better believe it, you better believe it.”

00:56

I don’t know if you’ve ever heard them say that. But I said, “Why? Why do I have to believe something, to go out and get my head blown off? Let’s just blow the head off – don’t give that stuff – I don’t want to hear it.” See? I don’t have to believe anything. We’re animals out there, fighting, that’s all.

01:14

But it seems like – we think that this is necessary – and people talk of discipline – what do you mean by that? There’s no greater discipline than a man who disciplines his own life. He’ll never be much harm to anybody else – because he won’t have reason to; he’s got values. But people who talk about discipline are generally talking about discipline from somebody else. We’re going to educate everybody; everybody’s going to be educated. Another hundred and fifty billion [dollars?] he says. 

[Forum Part 5 ends]]
01:52
=== Forum Part 6 ===
Q. ?? I wonder if ?? you talk today ?? benefits

02:10

R. Well, I can only tell you – I got stuck in the emotional thing, when I was about 12 years of age. Because I loved my mother and she was a Catholic. And I thought she was infallible, like the Pope. Because all mothers are, especially good mothers; you put your trust in them. so I went away to be a priest, and that was the emotional thing. I thought I would find God, and God would be a lovely creature.

And I found that these people were just humans, very miserable humans, one or two saints among them, the rest idiosexuals, two homosexuals, who the priests had warped and twisted, because they had – they just couldn’t adapt to it, they couldn’t adapt to total celibacy.

03:05

So I thought, “Hey, there’s something wrong. Where’s God? Where’s he watching this stuff?” Then I noticed that they had a brutality about them. They didn’t want you questioning them. Like you people are asking me questions – they didn’t want that. you had to believe. If you didn’t believe – see, I was just a kid, twelve years old when I went there – you got your face slapped, for being a Doubting Thomas.

03:33

So I – the result was that later I got to studying some other books. I got to looking elsewhere. And I went through the whole gamut; I went into Spiritualism, that’s how I came to see the – I went to a, groped around until I found a genuine materialization. And I saw the illogic of that – I mean it was a – there were entities, believe me. And don’t ever get the idea that we’re alone on this planet. We’re not alone. I don’t know how dense it is, but there are other intelligences here. Some of them can become visible. And this is not fiction; I’ve literally seen it, and witnessed an intelligence from them. They weren’t dead people. they were what they call “cabinet guides”. 

04:26

It’s a whole story. In the Albigen Papers I mention it somewhere; ,   I don’t know how much I say about it.

04:33

But the thing was that I tried by sheer force of logic to, and through the approach to the mind. [?] Now this is a very good way to get into the, your essence – to study the mind, study your own mind and observe your own thoughts. this little book that I wrote called Psychology of the Observer is just such an exercise; and it’s watching your own thought. And if you watch your own thought you become an external [?] observer, more and more. You watch all phases of thinking.

05:16

It’s like Hubert Benoit  – I don’t know if you’ve ever heard of Benoit and The Supreme Doctrine, ,   but what we have – we have a bipolar mind; we have good and evil, black and white, and all this sort of thing. And these are creations of the relative mind. And in reality there is no such thing as black and white – all we have is a scale, somewhere between two extremes; if you put black and white on a straight line, black down here, and white – in between you’re going to get gray, all different shades of gray.  So you don’t have clear-cut, hard definitions

05:57

But the observation of your thinking processes, if you pursue it, takes you to a place where your head explodes. I always say that the spiritual path is the thing of fattening up the head, until it’s filled enough with data, until [?]you can chop it off. When you chop your head off then, you know, in other words I’m talking about killing the mind, or stop thinking. It just – out of pure frustration it just stops. And in that moment when it stops, everything enters in.

06:38

Now I don’t know whether that answers your question or not. But what happened was, that’s almost a line [?]. Between the seminary and the realization I finally had, there was quite a bit of exploration and looking into cults, and joining the yogis.  I was a vegetarian; I didn’t smoke; I was totally celibate. And at times I thought, “This is a goofball adventure I’m on. I better quit and get married.” You know. “Because who in the hell is going to have me after a few more years of this?”

07:16

But I didn’t. I’d always be back on track I’d be walking down the street and find myself in the library, reading another book, and starting all over; maybe looking up some guru. There’s been [There were] some good people; I criticize a lot of the movements, but were some good movements, people who were sincere. 

07:36

Q. ??

08:05

R. You’re just begging? an answer. Basically I advise everybody to look under every rock. That isn’t necessarily education. When we think of education, we’re talking about somebody brainwashing somebody from the front of the room, saying, “Multiply two times two and four times four. That’s more or less what I found out studying chemistry, that this guy says, “Here, this is the way you work this chemical equation.” I said, “Why?” He says, “Because of te valence.” I couldn’t understand that he was talking about. I still didn’t. But I knew how to look at the cookbook – they used to call the chemical handbooks “cookbooks”. Look at the cookbook and you could do whatever they told you to do and come out the way they predicted. So all a chemist is, is a man who knows how to consult the handbook.

08:54

But that’s education. But what I’m talking about, looking under rocks, that’s real education; that is experience, that is first-hand knowledge. Because when I say “under every rock” I mean every sect – if your intuition tells you, “Hey, maybe these people have something.” Ok, go to the bother to check them out. Check them out, and don’t lack the courage to move on. Like I said, they’re here for a purpose – but I’m always afraid they’re here for a purpose of inhibiting progress, rather than promoting it.

09:34

The greatest spiritual events that happen in a person’s life don’t come from diploma, the glorious diploma; It comes from misery and agony and despair. And then the light that shines afterwards makes it all worthwhile.

09:57

Q. ??

R. You’re in a lazy stage. [laughs] You should never give up. Never give up.

10:20

Q. ??

R. You’ll know what happens, yeah.

Q. ??  negative ??

R. I don’t really know what you mean by a negative state of mind. A negative state of mind could be philosophically negative, it could be that you have appetites that are negative to advancement, or something of that sort. But if you know what they are then you know how to circumvent them. If you know you’ve got a negative state of mind, you know how to circumvent it. Because anything of that sort is – the symptoms are all germane to you, and they’re all privy to your memory and your knowledge of your past, and that sort of thing.

11:30

I don’t know what – a lot of times, things that people think are negative are really positive. Really positive. For instance, I’ll give you an example. When I was in my twenties, as I tell you, I’d get disgusted because there wasn’t the light – I didn’t hear the bugles; no angels. And I’d think, “I’m not spiritual. I’d better pick myself out a girl and get married.” [But] they wouldn’t have me. They wouldn’t have me. And I thought, ‘Geez, what kind of a curse am I under?” ?? ?? ?? I had a halo then. too. They wouldn’t have me.

12:03

But, you know, years later I felt, “My, what a blessing.” Because if I hadn’t have survived until – what was it, 1947, thirty years of age - if I had got married, that would have been the end of it; my ear would have been attuned to squalling babies. there would have been no room for any thinking. You’ve got to think when you come home from work. It’s too much of a distraction.

12:34

But I should bring this out. Rose was not self-made; Rose had help. I had help. And I realized this in my experience. there was something that led me every step of the way. There was something that put obstacles up and things that – I really wanted the obstacles, I wanted the girl. I never had the desire to drink or anything like that. You’d project on some meta-protoplasm and think it was superior.

I wrote a little poem about it, you know: 
<blockquote>
"This is my all, my god, my soul!"
"This is mine!"
Better say of this choice nebula of dust,
"Beautiful, is this fond mirror of my lust."
</blockquote>

13:37

Q. Do you feel like ???

R. Umm, I learned a lot. I think I learned a lot. What I experienced in the last fifteen years – in fact I got surprised when little things came up, like healing. Healing someone. That really surprised. Because I didn’t know? it was in the books. But I think what it is – you learn more about teaching as a job in itself.

14:11

For instance, when I come before an audience, I have to be able to speak in your language. And that’s the reason you may sense it – there’s a difficulty there, and I’m – everybody wants to know, “Please explain to me, give me a picture, paint it on the wall, what this experience is.” [Then,] “okay, now give me the prescription, I’ll go down to the drugstore or whatever it takes, and I’ll take the pills.” You know, they want to make everything objective and material. And you can’t do it. So consequently, this thing I read [the koans] – to me, it’s more important to me that you start thinking. than [?] if you just start asking questions, you’re going to forget tomorrow. 

14:56

But if you get that lecture of questions and red it once in awhile, it’s going to cause you to think; because it’s looking at life from another view. Now it’s not just another view, it’s a more accurate view. Because I/ maintain – I believe that those questions are valid, about “What is thought?” We’re thinking all the time, and we take it for granted that we know what thought is.

12:21

Q. ??

R. I have no perspective on them. I think they’re all important, but I felt that nobody would have five questions. Now I want you to think about that. [laughs] 

Q. ???

R. What?

Q. What’s the nature of what you do?

R. I write books.

Q. ??

R. We have a farm there where people come and stay; we’ve got cabins where they can go meditate or starve to death or do whatever they want to do.

16:04

Q. What are the – is there a  ??  structure ??

16:16

R. Well, no, there’s a – first of all, they have to be sincere. Then of course there’s a – people come for different reasons. For instance there’s the TAT Society, the TAT Foundation. And only TAT members come there; they become TAT members, which is, and that helps sustain the physical plant. And then there are some people who just do as they please; by that I mean, they are what you call friends of the truth, not real – they’re just damn good people we love to have them, and that sort of thing.

17:01

But then there’s the school, what I consider the root, the whole basis of the thing, are the people who are really trying to find it; and that’s the ones I’m looking for, because that’s he maximum purpose for my being. I’m not – I enjoy the people who are friendly and all that, but my life is dedicated to people who are – there’s some hope of getting them across, and getting them back to passing it on to somebody else.

17:42

Because this is the – I had a girl come to the – not a girl, she was twenty, I guess, I don’t know how old she was, maybe twenty-one, twenty, nineteen  – she and her husband came down and we’d have these rapport sittings. And she had an experience. and it surprise me, because number one, she didn’t want her husband attending, she was a little bored. And she didn’t like me, because I was a little too blunt perhaps.

18:14

And so we went into another room and sat, like a Quaker or Shaker whatever they are, and wait for the Holy Ghost to whatever you want to call it – it’s a power. And she stayed in the kitchen, until it was almost over. And we – there was a man there [Frank] him and his wife were there, and this thing was settling on him. When these things happen to you, you don’t need any further proof; you know where you’re at – you know exactly that you’re on the track. And he was, this ...

18:54

Now sometimes I hate to say this, because it seems like- very few people believe it. But in the final essence I shouldn’t care, whether people believe it or not. I don’t mean it that way, but it’s just that this is what happens in a rapport meeting. But I can see, generally, a spiritual force. The closest I cam describe it is the Holy Ghost: “Where two or more are gathered in my name, I am in their midst.”  But this happens when people get together, with an honest intention, a sincere intention, and with no other motives, just to find something, to find truth.

19:36

This generates – not every time, but occasionally, if everybody’s right – and I can see it, moving. It will move around, and we generally sit in a circle, and it will move around, and I’ll know who it’s going to stop on, and I’ll point. And sometimes t will knock them off the chair. That’s what happened with her – she walked into the room and nobody – it was over Frank. And it leaped across, just like a voltage, it leaped across and hit her and knocked her down.

20:14

And this is a – this type of meeting requires a certain lifestyle and dedication. You can’t come in half drunk and that sort of thing and sit down in such a meeting. So it’s the group of people that – I know that they’re dead-serious. If they’re dead serious, then that’s all I need to know.

20:46

But those are the ones who have access to the cabins, if they want to. Because the people in the group today, yet still, take a solid month off. I don’t tell them – I don’t tell anybody what to do. I have no rules, I have no doctrine; I just say if you want to get a result, try this. I don’t have – well I had a fellow in the second year, and they’ve been doing it for years. Every year they take a month off. Without eating – they go to the cabin and they don’t take any food. Sometimes they’ll take water or juice or something.

21:23

And they’ll sit there for a solid month, or maybe three weeks – no goals. But they invariably come out with a new perspective. Because they seem to have the last twelve month – it’s a gradual deterioration of the nature. [?] So that’s what goes on. 

And other than that, I don’t – I’m not aware of what people are curious about [here] – so if you are curious, just ask me, and I’ll try to explain it to you.

But I believe that there’s a predictableness [predictability] about this, and I – a person isn’t around very long before I know what their susceptibility is, to something coming out, something developing.

22:19

Q. ??

R. Umm, sometimes it’s weird; sometimes it’s strange. Now this girl – she didn’t care what we were doing. She could care less. It surprised me as much as it did her, ?? the group. I don’t even know – she was antagonistic. I don’t know why she even came into the room. But we’ve had other cases similar to that, where a person, the first time they sit in a group, the thing, something happens to them.

22:54

But that sets the mind, or the person, into a – one thing, it’s like a milepost; that you realize you’re on a path. There are revelations. Only they’re not verbalized. But you find a peace of mind, the tranquility that you’ll never find any other way. I shouldn’t say any other way; there’s possibly - for a four? meetings? in church consider to be good.

23:28

But this has that one peculiar method, you might say. [the rapport sittings] This isn’t Zen, incidentally. That’s not Zen. That’s just something that we decided to do, some of the people. And it works. Now of course, what happens is that the – with this party it was traumatic; it was very traumatic. But she didn’t get clear to what I consider the final – there’s a final realization she didn’t quite reach.

24:04

But she saw the world as an illusion. This is one of the things you learn down the road, that this road is – even if you study physics you find that there’s no separation between space and time; they’re a unity. And we separate them, because we’re polar and bicameral  we separate them into space and time. But our time is only germane to the sun; our day is recorded by the sun. Somebody else’s sun might turn [go around?] more slowly, so we don’t know what their consciousness would be. Duration is what I was referring to in the thing.

24:48

But there’s no – to me – I saw the need a long time ago for a place where people could go and think. It’s very difficult. I was not married [?] I tried to write The Albigen Papers – I got the notes for it for five or ten years, the notes for The Albigen Papers. It’s very difficult when you have little children around to do any thinking. You’ve got to get out. So I had a farm, so I went out on the farm. Always had a few head of cattle out there to have some excuse to go out there and spend the winter.

25:36

You know we often think, you often think about people who become – I’m not quite, very much in favor of the ascetic monks. Because they start to play another game; they start to make up another thing. And that’s the – like the old talk of theology, of the theologians trying to determine how many angels you can get on the point of a pin.

26:06

Well that sounds ridiculous, but nevertheless theology is a tremendous lot that way. that for instance the Catholic church got into all sorts of breakdowns of how many prayers you had to say to counter so many sins. Number one, I don’t believe in sin, so I don’t need the – people don’t sin, they have accidents. They’re used, they’re abused. Not by other people, but by the program they’re thrust into in this life.

People used to say, “Do you believe that you committed a sin, or that you commit sins?” I say, “I’m too damn stupid to sin.” I don’t know what’s right and wrong, in the absolute sense. What’s right is you die. What’s wrong is that’s you’re alive, perhaps. See?

26:57

Q. ??

R. Time to head for the high chaparral. And I’ve got my watch on crossways I think.

Yes? [no question] See that did it; you smothered him.

I’m glad to have met all of you. Hope to see you again someday.

Q. ??

R. Sure, go ahead.

Q. ??

R. Yes. But I’m in the Wheeling phone book, and that’s your best way oif you get down there – call somebody. That’s area code 304. Paul has it. But also these – if you’ve got a pencil, these books all have the TAT address in it. And that’s the thing to do, to always let me know. Because this is fifteen miles from Wheeling, the farm is. So consequently, it’s better for you to give a call and we’ll meet you in Wheeling, or have somebody meet you, and tell you the best way to get there. this time of the year, some of the roads aren’t as good as others.

28:30

A big snow on the ridges drifts deep; in the valleys it doesn’t, so you come up Wheeling Creek, so to speak. But if the creek iis high, then you take the ridges.

Q. ??

R. Yes, there’s some old catalogs there if you ...

Q. Thanks very much Mr. Rose.

R. You’re welcome. [applause]I appreciate it.

Q. ?? over there are some copies of past lectures and tapes, ?? free catalog ??
== Footnotes ==
  Url:  http://direct-mind.org/index.php5?title=1989-0212-Zen-Is-Action-Columbus 
For access, send email to editors@direct-mind.org 
   This is from “The Lecture of Questions”, written by Rose, copyrighted by the TAT Foundation, published in Profound Writings East and West. Page 210.  http://tatfoundation.org/profound.htm 
  Being critical of current social norms.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serotonin 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neurotransmitters 
  Al Ghazali – discussed later in this lecture.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B._F._Skinner 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Chilton_Pearce 
  Crack in the Cosmic Egg. Pdf here: http://selfdefinition.org/psychology/ 
  Franz Hartmann in Life of Paracelsus: "Philosophy informs us that the world is made out of the will of God. If, then, all things are made out of will, it logically follows that the causes of all internal diseases are also originating within the will. All diseases, such as are not caused by any action coming from the outside, are due to a perverted action of the will in man, such as is not in harmony with the laws of Nature or God." http://selfdefinition.org/magic/paracelsus/hartmann-paracelsus-07-medicine.htm 
  “Third eye”, from Radha-Soami. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Surat_Shabd_Yoga 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ectoplasm_(paranormal) 
  According to Orkin, 30 days.
  See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gestalt_psychology 
  Author Bulwer-Lytton, 1871: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vril
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Élan_vital 
  See Rose, Transmission Papers.
   http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Starets 
  Babcock & Wilcox subsidiary, October, 1947 (two years after the war). See Robert Martin, Peace to the Wanderer, p. 26-28 (p. 32-34 of pdf).  http://selfdefinition.org/rose/
  The Christian Scientist was Lambert Kooistra, director of the lab according Martin. Rose mentions Kooistra in “Defining the Truth,” part 2: http://www.searchwithin.org/journal/tat_journal-14.html#4 
  The field is in the windings; the armature is the moving part.
  See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetic_pump 
  The electromagnetic pump for NaK was apparently not operational in the Nautilus, but was used in the Seawolf: http://atomicpowerreview.blogspot.mx/2011/12/60th-anniversary-of-ebr-i-power.html  
  For a description of the pump see “The USS Seawolf Sodium-Cooled Reactor Submarine” pdf:  http://www.ans.org/about/officers/docs/seawolf_sfr_sea_story_051712.pdf
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Savant_syndrome 
  Rose from 1980-Winter-Psychology-and-Metaphysics-Columbus: “I’ve always said hypnosis is one of the best ways of studying the human mind because the human mind can be beguiled so rapidly, so quickly, instantaneously. You can put somebody in another paradigm.”
  Hauserman also spoke at a Symposium at the farm, August, 1978, on “Applied Kinesiology”. See TAT News and Calendar: http://www.searchwithin.org/journal/tat_journal-05.html#10 
  Similar event at the farm: http://selfdefinition.org/rose/articles/1982-june-higher-mind-seminar-farm.htm 
  Chapter 6, “Lecture on Betweenness,” Columbus, Ohio, 1980, page 235. Also see Chapter 7, “Notes on Betweenness,” page 261
  Pdf here: http://selfdefinition.org/afterlife/ 
  See 1965 newspaper clipping: http://selfdefinition.org/christian/paul-wood-story.htm
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_W. 
  Rose mentions later in the talk that he knew friends of Bill Wilson who lived in Columbus.
  Described in Robert Martin, Peace to the Wanderer, p. 95 (p. 101 of pdf). http://selfdefinition.org/rose/ 
  Summer, 1963, Peace to the Wanderer. p 91 (p 97 of pdf)  
  Search Martin’s book for “Leon Wood” for Martin’s experience with Wood in Texas
  http://selfdefinition.org/christian/guggenheim-gleason.htm 
  No link was located to the atomic bombs. Wood was stationed in Australia and New Guinea according to his obituary. Apparently Wood was involved with conventional bombing (firebombing) over Japan: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_raids_on_Japan
  Wood was born in 1917, the same year as Rose. At the end of WW2 he would have been 28. However, Martin says Wood didn’t get serious about the Bible until close to age 40. See p. 92 (p. 98 of pdf). Martin met Wood in 1959. Upon Wood’s visit to Akron in 1963 he would have been 46, and he died only two years later, in 1965. See Wood’s obituary: http://selfdefinition.org/christian/paul-wood-obituary.htm
  Luke 11:9. “Ask and it will be given to you.” The Lord’s Prayer is Luke 11:2-4.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emanuel_Swedenborg 
  Already footnoted in Part 1:   Profound Writings, East and West. http://tatfoundation.org/profound.htm 
  Rose has mentioned deep sea fish [can’t find] that developed light-emitting organs so they can see.
  See “Intuition and Reason” by Rose: http://tatfoundation.org/forum2004-10.htm#1 
  Rose’s brother Joe.
  (1907-1976)  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kathryn_Kuhlman 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transcendental_Meditation 
  Gary Zukav. Pdf here: http://selfdefinition.org/science/ 
  See “Robert Anton Wilson Explains Quantum Physics”: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XEZtw1yt8Kc 
  The first use of the term "black hole" in print was by journalist Ann Ewing in her article "'Black Holes' in Space", dated 18 January1964. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Helena_Blavatsky 
  A very complicated system: http://davidpratt.info/secretcyc.htm 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pralaya 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Valence_bond_theory 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elizabeth_Clare_Prophet 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Gurdjieff 
  See Ouspensky, In Search of the Miraculous, chapter 4. Pdf here: http://selfdefinition.org/gurdjieff/ 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Four_temperaments 
  http://tatfoundation.org/profound.htm 
  The works listed here are included in Profound Writings.
  Rose erroneously says Diamond Sutra, but it’s the Platform Sutra that is included Profound Writings East and Wests. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Platform_Sutra 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francis_Thompson 
  Rose mentions the name, but it is inaudible. [Sounds like Juice << omit]
  A collection from the Upanishads.
  H.P. Blavatsky, “Chosen fragments from the Book of the Golden Precepts.”
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timothy_Leary 
  Leary and Richard Alpert were psychologists.
  Vincent.
  Also see 1988-0217-Hypnosis-Lecture-Demonstration-Akron
  Raymond Moody, Life After Life. PDF: http://selfdefinition.org/afterlife/ 
  1988 – http://selfdefinition.org/afterlife/ first 26 minutes of the video. 
Alternative location: http://ndemovies.worldispnetwork.com/ndemovies/Geraldo.wmv
  Phyllis Atwater, author, Coming Back To Life, min. 28. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/P._M._H._Atwater 
  Minute 37 of video.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shirley_MacLaine 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Z._Knight#Ramtha 
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spiritualism 
  This is a generic “Joe” – Rose’s brother Joe was still living then.
  Generally cash collateral is required.
  Spraggett’s bio – 3 page PDF:  http://selfdefinition.org/afterlife/ 
  The Unexplained, 1967.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camp_Chesterfield   
  "This was a fraud so crude that it was an insult to the intelligence."
  Nuclear submarine program, Babcock and Wilcox, 1947.
  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mediumship#Spirit_guide 
  Chapters 2 and 3.
  See Nov. 12, 1974 Obstacles, Cleveland and Oct. 23, 1974 Laws, Columbus for a detailed account.  http://direct-mind.org/index.php5?title=1974-1112-Obstacles-Cleveland
http://direct-mind.org/index.php5?title=1974-1023-Laws-Columbus 
  No Wikipedia page yet (Dec. 2011). Bio here: http://www.selfdiscoveryportal.com/bzbio.htm
  Full text in PDF: http://selfdefinition.org/zen/ 
  Recap of ideas here: http://www.selfdiscoveryportal.com/bzrecap.htm 
  Primarily Radha Soami. 
  Carillon, page 48.
  Jane S.
  Matthew 18:20.
  Julian Jaynes, The Origin of Consciousness and the Bicameral Mind.


== End ==
</div>